From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
cc: bzm@2bz.de, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #17957: psql-16beta1 \df+ does not show the function body
In-reply-to: <ZHjwIHz/26HITdUC@momjian.us>
References: <17957-e1db8b1c15af444a@postgresql.org>
 <ZHjwIHz/26HITdUC@momjian.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
	message dated "Thu, 01 Jun 2023 15:23:12 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <48276.1685657889.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 18:18:09 -0400
Message-ID: <48277.1685657889@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/48277.1685657889%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Thu, Jun  1, 2023 at 05:57:19PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> The release notes do not mention \df+. 

> We had this commit in PG 16:
	
> 	    Show "internal name" not "source code" in psql's \df+ command.

> I didn't think anyone would mind the change so I didn't document it in
> the release notes --- should I?

I think it needs to be mentioned, since it's a nontrivial user-visible
behavioral change.  I'm not sure it's a compatibility item, but it
ought to be there somewhere.

			regards, tom lane