Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8v7d-0003mS-Uc for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:05:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8v7d-0004In-0s for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:05:17 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nT2-0000OD-PO for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:54:53 +0000 Received: from la-in-x022b.1e100.net ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b] helo=mail-la0-x22b.google.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8nT0-0003ZR-Qd for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:54:52 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ek20so335729lab.2 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:54:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WwtbmnzbbE+ryQ87Wbeql60kprFyKHkL7j0JpXTyeds=; b=beaw08GyxLxr8Y7SFFVMdZw4AaqckCvhERD1+mkVZImO/5Sxojfu7rcCrZAVR0uAiN 8FCpdz0YGKe88QeX0OCHLKlVb9Y3vJCniijsnUTxaLfpBfj8Xl9wF3/UenBfwUHNH6RI jLBdTPXFEo3OKIzcq+TT5Z/uEhyHP/HwN2On5vsZJDvwNPXqIKkVR9SAjX3svSzaLvPH 0LgwGSNbSD17Jso6hYc89CI1W1G1urd9VEmdMX6tgZNfjOMnQC8w0bqr+oBhECjuNNNf J1a+r3brLa1JEU8RilpLONyQxDdebLPf+JhhqJmulKQSDuWgRabcoK5GKzGLcDCRxZZo I2zQ== X-Received: by 10.112.38.98 with SMTP id f2mr604762lbk.61.1361519688439; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:54:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([84.47.131.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm441944lbd.11.2013.02.21.23.54.46 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:54:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5127244D.4030101@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:54:53 +0400 From: Claude Speed User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Janes CC: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: new BUG: "postgresql 9.2.3: very long query time" References: <5124D2BE.5090001@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org 21.02.2013 21:25, Jeff Janes пишет: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Claude Speed wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Postgresql 9.2.3 is processing my query is much longer than Postgresql >> 9.1.8: >> Postgresql 9.1.8 - 2292 ms >> Postgresql 9.2.3 - 163336 ms >> >> I provided my query in attach and the database dump too, >> this bug is reproducible. >> >> Operating system: Gentoo x86_64 Linux 2.6.36 > The slowness was introduced with this: > > commit e2fa76d80ba571d4de8992de6386536867250474 > Author: Tom Lane > Date: Fri Jan 27 19:26:38 2012 -0500 > > Use parameterized paths to generate inner indexscans more flexibly. > > > Do you know of simpler queries that also exhibits this behavior? It > would certainly make analysis of the issue easier. > > > Cheers, > > Jeff We was trying to find simple query, sadly unlucky. Only this query is reproducible. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs