Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iycXq-0000fq-N1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:17:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iycW4-0007aK-B2 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:15:56 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iycW4-0007aD-29 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:15:56 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iycVx-0000Vb-8y for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:15:55 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 013EFg4C005440; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 09:15:42 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Gustafsson cc: depesz@depesz.com, Hamid Akhtar , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #16171: Potential malformed JSON in explain output In-reply-to: <2C0825D5-B231-431F-A505-E6B848B250FB@yesql.se> References: <16171-b72259ab75505fa2@postgresql.org> <495433FC-A268-4956-9B61-5FB135EE5B73@yesql.se> <157985813081.742.12901374861257824963.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org> <9342.1580585875@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5217695A-8776-4F59-823A-B391DCA1F601@yesql.se> <1763.1580662112@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2C0825D5-B231-431F-A505-E6B848B250FB@yesql.se> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson message dated "Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:55:19 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5438.1580739342.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 09:15:42 -0500 Message-ID: <5439.1580739342@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Daniel Gustafsson writes: > I guess I'm leaning towards backpatching, but it's not entirely clear-cut. That's where I stand too. I'll wait a day or so to see if anyone else comments; but if not, I'll back-patch. regards, tom lane