From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD_?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2?=
 <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: No libldap_r in OpenLDAP 2.5 - use
 LDAP_API_FEATURE_X_OPENLDAP_REENTRANT from ldap_features.h
In-reply-to: <8bf71cb05679342f8a09206cb03fc727d5d52830.camel@aegee.org>
References: <20210825052142.Horde.fX47Irhz5YmXoRVbIbyYUJm@webmail.aegee.org>
 <520273.1629872978@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3894d2a91d141b0fe454da01b3b7faad6fa9d07a.camel@aegee.org>
 <544882.1629900910@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <8bf71cb05679342f8a09206cb03fc727d5d52830.camel@aegee.org>
Comments: In-reply-to =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD_?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2?=
 <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
	message dated "Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:27:26 +0300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <545972.1629902200.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:36:40 -0400
Message-ID: <545973.1629902200@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/545973.1629902200%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

=3D?UTF-8?Q?=3DD0=3D94=3DD0=3DB8=3DD0=3DBB=3DD1=3D8F=3DD0=3DBD_?=3D =3D?UT=
F-8?Q?=3DD0=3D9F=3DD0=3DB0=3DD0=3DBB=3DD0=3DB0=3DD1=3D83=3DD0=3DB7=3DD0=3D=
BE=3DD0=3DB2?=3D <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org> writes:
> I run Linux from Scratch system.  All old binaries, are linked with
> libldap(_r)-2.4, all new things get linked towards libldap-2.5 .  So
> the configuration step always sees libldap-2.5 as most current (and its
> header files).  I can in theory point the build process to versioned-
> headers, but I do not have to.

> The problem here is, that libldap_r-2.4, libldap-2.4, and libldap-2.5
> are installed on the system.  I want that libpq.so is not linked with
> libldap_r-2.4, but with libldap-2.5.

If that is your plan, then you should have only the 2.5 libldap-devel
support installed, not 2.4.  In particular, that would mean that you
shouldn't have any .so symlinks for the 2.4 libraries, which should
cause configure not to see them.

			regards, tom lane