Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rsOs1-006oTI-NR for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:19:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rsOs0-007Lwd-O5 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:19:16 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rsOs0-007LwV-EG for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:19:16 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rsOry-000YEy-5G for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:19:15 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 434FJBMm562619; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 11:19:11 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Wolfgang Walther cc: Peter Eisentraut , Andres Freund , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm In-reply-to: <12606570-50cc-4e66-9c5c-d9e61764551d@technowledgy.de> References: <4093813.1710899588@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4095435.1710900216@sss.pgh.pa.us> <477fa513-6bf0-456d-8d24-1e22a19df671@technowledgy.de> <20240322001948.atp2eetusylgjyw2@awork3.anarazel.de> <40543180-a0a2-495b-8d34-23b46c28f533@technowledgy.de> <20240326001447.wcatfvx45tkmizji@awork3.anarazel.de> <0a48d551-50e1-4bd3-8d46-8421e3b1b724@technowledgy.de> <7764f41f-29f6-428f-b40d-43ba2da38170@eisentraut.org> <545893.1712241401@sss.pgh.pa.us> <12606570-50cc-4e66-9c5c-d9e61764551d@technowledgy.de> Comments: In-reply-to Wolfgang Walther message dated "Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:01:32 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <562617.1712243951.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 11:19:11 -0400 Message-ID: <562618.1712243951@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Wolfgang Walther writes: >> That is not the concern here. What I think Peter is worried about, >> and certainly what I'm worried about, is that a breakage in >> SanityCheck comprehensively breaks all CI testing for all Postgres >> developers. > You'd have to commit a failing patch first to break CI for all other > developers. No, what I'm more worried about is some change in the environment causing the build to start failing. When that happens, it'd better be an environment that many of us are familiar with and can test/fix. regards, tom lane