Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1abUf1-0006AB-JB for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:55:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abUf1-0000eq-37 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:55:27 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abUf0-0000ek-QZ for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:55:26 +0000 Received: from mimolette.dalibo.net ([212.85.157.144]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abUew-00051r-89 for pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 14:55:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (aur75-1-78-192-238-147.fbxo.proxad.net [78.192.238.147]) by mimolette.dalibo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D1A41F10E2E; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:54:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: BUG #13770: Extending recovery_min_apply_delay on Standby causes it to be unavailable for a while To: Fujii Masao , Michael Paquier References: <20151111155006.2644.84564@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <20151230140218.5jqkq3rjoejlrgq7@alap3.anarazel.de> <11507.1451489748@sss.pgh.pa.us> <56D76F61.5060504@dalibo.com> Cc: Tom Lane , Andres Freund , Greg Clough , PostgreSQL mailing lists , Simon Riggs , Robert Haas From: Julien Rouhaud Message-ID: <56D8500A.3060407@dalibo.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:54:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org On 03/03/2016 15:42, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Julien Rouhaud >> wrote: >>> I just reviewed the patch. It's pretty straightforward and works as >>> intended, so I mark it as ready for committer. > > The patch looks good to me. > > We should backpatch this? I'm tempted to do that > because it seems an oversight. > It's user-visible change of behavior, though. > The user-visible previous situation is to have a standby unavailable for no good reason, so +1 for backpatching it. > Regards, > -- Julien Rouhaud http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs