Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ki2Cz-0004RM-UW for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:20:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ki2Cy-0004Vx-Rq for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:20:12 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ki2Cy-0004Vq-LS for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:20:12 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ki2Cw-0002Gc-Lu for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:20:12 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0APLK7fr570575; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:20:07 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: Peter Eisentraut , turon.david@seznam.cz, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #16743: psql doesn't show whole expression in stored column In-reply-to: <20201125164240.GA26300@momjian.us> References: <16743-7b1bacc4af76e7ad@postgresql.org> <286182.1606232817@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7a1faa2c-d4d1-67fd-03fe-29ef7e240301@enterprisedb.com> <426714.1606316633@sss.pgh.pa.us> <464990.1606320939@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20201125164240.GA26300@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:42:40 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <570573.1606339207.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:20:07 -0500 Message-ID: <570574.1606339207@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:15:39AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Should we back-patch this? I think that the truncation behavior became >> significantly more of a problem with the addition of the GENERATED >> feature; before that it was clearer what was going on. So I'm mildly >> inclined to back-patch to v12 where that came in. > Works for me. Done that way. regards, tom lane