Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xBZn2-00000003H2D-07QQ for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:30:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xBZn0-0000000FVwO-3rtA for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:30:42 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xBZn0-0000000FVwE-2m3U for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:30:42 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xBZmy-00000001tNC-3XvF for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:30:41 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 68TFUdlu682273; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:30:39 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Ross Burton cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #19727: pg-combinebackup fails to link In-reply-to: References: <19727-32d67d9dea410f38@postgresql.org> <599939.1790693300@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Ross Burton message dated "Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:56:22 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <682271.1790695839.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:30:39 -0400 Message-ID: <682272.1790695839@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Ross Burton writes: > That's a good point. This is GCC 16.2 and binutils 2.47... Hm. The newest Linux installation I have at hand is Fedora 44 with gcc 16.2 + binutils 2.46, and it doesn't show this behavior. Can you check on whether gcc is invoking /usr/bin/ld? If it's calling some other linker maybe that's the cause. I'm suspicious in any case that there's something odd about either your installation or your environment. I don't recall ever hearing a similar complaint, so this linking behavior can't be common. regards, tom lane