Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w15WL-002Xys-1G for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:37:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w15WI-005JQr-2g for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:37:51 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w15WI-005JQj-1n for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:37:51 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w15WH-00000001yop-0ToL for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:37:49 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4852c9b4158so20455685e9.0 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 09:37:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybertec.at; s=google; t=1773419868; x=1774024668; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8h2jX4E/egQMlKsNJdpZvY2nTeK7HeSJHNwlb4bndt0=; b=FJ4Ux+fmL3PpDflfwzSEJmQxptuMLrjWUJsSuV6nuqrJIP36aJcokPFyaipTU7qB2y u7PG+fkSVqWR+CznEeU/LWRUMB6Y5vIN7aciDZz5tflzTxUNoenBG3EWXAtKAspbedmu RTVohB6JqtcsJThYz4u4Eb3gH72cSlAjVgSzYkd0R3komvhdyf+sFnmUWvKLH/xF6IHH xzwojNbmRV7w8/nRngR3O2fW8ahc4pNiTmggwD30XlfQGTG4MeBqJP845twNMwNY3zwJ JQsAj/H0sEsxfEdF93hOfrNDIcK1tpjo+W4Hlv23UoXe8RRR9YGaIy0jl1pQSh6Hzb4Y wQAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1773419868; x=1774024668; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8h2jX4E/egQMlKsNJdpZvY2nTeK7HeSJHNwlb4bndt0=; b=g5n0cMJ1GdzwEKl3asDye5KZZYcIdNrLr9nXbHyQW3viFgMLdr9kXxYKd1WWRJMX1W 98Zv5BKhQ89zB2Ww0btWqfHFyd09UMiItombtjVvkjosDpbLIOLdR5+qAe5XcQjEtt6h uQx2yBDHUuLVTlQyvYPd0DVj1JBrp8Enwvd8WnHceAuWHwFTmj385W5QH5Qqw1IEOh65 nVzggyvFArtfsoKBrR3utVtIDKHEPUcLUbt8ilw0mxGLCCtNOMmAcMQzJfVpVsvjSE9A A1fM+avy7tn621Y+znAXGpSF/2jFwgp0KZOYWiE1QguPIbImY5lTzBN0rXx8R5lxr2ba tzZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyA6xvpMV2Uq2fWJLMi2Qc53Q+SGYoKlovStE5UnMDAXWY15YeS NQIbo8RHB8R7SVlJl/Jx2pIJOtoPTOiWVZRefAaaTPMSy0c4mqDii6NwN8eRZgXvTEMiLlAs9lC it0Ky X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzyewOiEdadxWfR88Gto6Fffo5NYpOFjX9K6IuCE7u8kwWW53g77bxfgB/2oZgh uv/DA6XOdJAowQ1cOogsDnnMIDsRSjxGOwg1u9aIRj3U6FdZX/cqb6sPLOmY7vdXQ0DXBWc9F8Y 8RwNbisD3II9m9xx/ot9vs5iKFikfSCm6565GwAwjAd31P2nv+e2FZMYGEXPvUSgw3zWvRACMX8 h43wOzu7sL9ne2/cpZxjJQGUfJ7kOPIYMABwp7ya92/IWg6c/H6EDD2D+2a9kx/MzospTNNaLph 8ngTeFxBCZryrqdH8ZxUx6TwWBUKbUyiXsyHppCI20PCodBCfyyAdF8xTyoOy9d0mK4rXJ6/HIb 8v+5Reafcm/h+zRk4yqoit3GRd6uVwfl8YsR8sFGoulxfiNebmq9909/NA5JufRBjIhgLPOSmvf fqMrBjbwNJEjuijC+eNJpBti2Zf0Gch2+/bKxtCfwKtwFX+1SruMew X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:8486:b0:483:8062:b43 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48556702d64mr69428485e9.19.1773419867604; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 09:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laurenz.albe-K4N0CV00F97414D ([185.109.152.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-48556415294sm26638945e9.6.2026.03.13.09.37.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Mar 2026 09:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7b029b1636b24069bfc0d3a779e0a5521f60e57f.camel@cybertec.at> Subject: Re: BUG #19432: recovery fails at invalid checkpoint record From: Laurenz Albe To: Felix Hamme Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:37:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <19432-3c569e9472f42cee@postgresql.org> <58ceb75034bf694d52f81e898df35e14122fe5c8.camel@cybertec.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Fri, 2026-03-13 at 09:35 +0100, Felix Hamme wrote: > Is it safe in general to use mv for wal files? In other words, do the > currently supported postgres versions run restore_command only once > per wal file? As you found out, no... Yours, Laurenz Albe