public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Andrey Borodin <[email protected]>
To: Kyle Kingsbury <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 11:18:58 +0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
> On 1 Jun 2026, at 06:49, Kyle Kingsbury <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This behavior disappears
Glad that was it. There's a separate case I'd still like your eyes on: savepoints.
README-SSI says predicate locks must survive a subtransaction rollback, because the
subxact's reads still affect what the top transaction writes. By that same reasoning,
shouldn't a serialization failure raised while checking such a read DooM the top
transaction, rather than being swallowed by ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT?
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
view thread (10+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible G2-item at SERIALIZABLE
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox