Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qkduj-00FNjp-Of for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:13:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qkdui-00F3Fs-1M for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:13:44 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qkduh-00F3FZ-Nc for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:13:43 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qkdue-007Q7R-OO for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:13:42 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 38P5DbGH088009; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 01:13:37 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Thomas Munro , Alexander Lakhin , Sergei Kornilov , Noah Misch , Kyotaro Horiguchi , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Fujii Masao , pgbf@twiska.com Subject: Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary In-reply-to: References: <64446.1695611228@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:29:54 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <88007.1695618817.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 01:13:37 -0400 Message-ID: <88008.1695618817@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:07:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> That one is mine, so let me know if there's something particular >> you'd like me to check. > That would help, thanks! Could it be possible to check if the > attached patch applied on HEAD influences the fate of the recovery > test 009_twophase.pl? That's one thing I am really doubting about, > and we've not done much since REL_16_STABLE has been forked.. Applying this does *not* fix it. Stack trace looks the same as in my previous message. regards, tom lane