Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnr5-0007KG-VC for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:03:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnr4-0005TU-RW for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:03:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnr4-0005Oj-8A for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:03:50 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXnr1-0004Vl-Nq for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:03:49 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id l6so2730534plh.9 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 10:03:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enterprisedb.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PhHW/PyLJUtfGglnJx0c4ytalornp6wLyjUkmwrbqhA=; b=DzwNk5G8StGx1qAcfrQQlqVFR69gk3FrkEEvy/Z5YBUViNHdLLytD/6t1JU1Xh5la3 LFav9Zq11HJoX52DfTGYceMcJnob+BorgMPO7sevy9XXb0bVGNQ6k5FaOKO5+zEDaBBf wENJehnXh9Vn149y5vpGwGprXkfqpO9HY2SmkwJ0wL1dIPQz27Ez2LeLYMB/j4K/0b9z yIpYf7kn0HbUukjEWtxP2U8Y3REAM5LluoduoP1u77jxjjCprpl3GhXYZPdh7e58tuiN 6SlpUy4PsOTE27KPmIBexAbaxsBs3yUfTh3eh+v6zS26HgsdlF4qQDcu+gUkMnK0sWq/ YjgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PhHW/PyLJUtfGglnJx0c4ytalornp6wLyjUkmwrbqhA=; b=ei5O31VYpHVVpiw5vR2ioi+Q1kLtl5O7uDfykQx9dU+C8+c0e7MEM5rEQeu54zTZdX i+YpLrrlmbEtG56EfQSARKxeM4eoUsPcxKthEntuOJYopqucJL1CZ+TBoMraMOci09D0 K9iV9xhjBIvuZbdqB14vMAMnG3SwwXkRxjesmgYa6qrjOwCNHK6yXGB6/U+2f9ZmYh7F MzckqwTxEKV9djvsU6yXyE8cFbl8774lRCAOntkpA/j9WHRtQJT2sunIQbEkM6+eGO4H lcsELi80KnV4905ZZtj5aqsvuxL8IBXGJxeqDiDA3oz68xJ/08V3gJX1bJqUPMXhcXjS CMrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531SH5849nOt9BeiOj20iti2V4dStCjhvAkQncVci2SW0S7HKT4n mVfhOH4mtmC224ShMHAQ6LyBLmlwawGKO+sVRZRE3zFb49w/QtKqFHcAEy4PRaA85suC/YnkcI2 iyGLGeMdZiFUFevlEh8r/MYhiTFxrbTXrYVInAAj1ymTSdxa6Gzbx5jiuffUxkrxvnmN92LiwQB 9Uw/L4DL4EhSB2W00XOrjxEuh4BbYze+Vsc15k X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUxU0z1KzxXQm3AxBjZFpdBe2DaAe1pBEtjXpIFmT9djcm/dYDz7ZmUpr5XECsaEhmyTB8PA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:3b49:: with SMTP id t9mr5065424pjf.218.1633453426184; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 10:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop280-ma-us.hitronhub.home (24-113-193-150.wavecable.com. [24.113.193.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t3sm14444325pfb.100.2021.10.05.10.03.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 10:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations From: Mark Dilger In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:03:44 -0700 Cc: Robert Haas , Alexander Lakhin , PostgreSQL-development Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <17212-34dd4a1d6bba98bf@postgresql.org> <28B36E41-1E8F-4DC1-A924-711621BA4972@enterprisedb.com> <386F66EE-DEFD-42EA-9DB2-102BF3414669@enterprisedb.com> To: Peter Geoghegan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Info: enterprisedb,google_mail,monitor X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Sent: true X-Gm-Spam: 0 X-Gm-Phishy: 0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On Oct 5, 2021, at 9:58 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >=20 > I apologize to Mark. I took no offense. Actually, I owe you a thank-you for having put so = much effort into debating the behavior with me. I think the patch to = fix bug #17212 will be better for it. (And thanks to Robert for the concern.) =E2=80=94 Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company