public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Henson Choi <[email protected]>
To: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeroen Vermeulen <[email protected]>
Cc: VASUKI M <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 18:39:13 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAAe_zDuTVCQuLnZv827yR2uAx+fgSixeWa+gvEgtSgQe_M28A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoYnU1me+nU6Mj+jE+SP87xY2AomkdgZptdqqKLh=Cq3GQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CA+TgmoaRGSezRaA7x00X495Qho8WGTzggbDSUt-JsruXceZWug@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+zULE4L4rA2DLAcfy=eQL7w_ZexV4P5zpQRbP=_qrhJBEOzjg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAE2r8H5vaSyaC_t1FcpHBo-BB_=SrFj7GFnOC-SxC6WDf5c9VA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+zULE47EXZOp7qKYODd+mjSgDiR-WX5ZNBkwdKnj-Zc0FT58w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoZaoc37ohnhF5inoPxWzfoznV483xQw8Fmw+ELFScv47g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+TgmoaoW4F2rRzYcQQim9ddT4-6H3oi0UYV9Ucw-rRQ5MdHsg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGKy-ViGBXdOjcPownBM=OdWiULO8H1RyH1r_8qNp=U4CA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAAAe_zCLVunjt1u+2E86shwc3hk1x4bzUyU86nY1fq-nAVYN0Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGJMrcS=hBkqVk=5pjM4w8edG=_ArASC82RqB6HQro-v-g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAAe_zCwaccH7h+GOtHbo_docCY-o0c5NMRuYkdz15f=KL4f0g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAAe_zAFz1v-3b7Je4L+=wZM3UGAczXV47YVZfZi9wbJxspxeA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGJunp3ZszLxaHndkMoGiT_0SW+3FSiS=v=79FHsR6Rr+A@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoYnU1me+nU6Mj+jE+SP87xY2AomkdgZptdqqKLh=Cq3GQ@mail.gmail.com>
2026년 5월 15일 (금) 오전 4:36, Robert Haas <[email protected]>님이 작성:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 2:59 AM Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
> wrote:>
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 5:58 PM Henson Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > While reading through the encoding alias table in
> src/common/encnames.c,
> > > I noticed a few long-standing inaccuracies and omissions in the
> per-entry
> > > comments for the three Korean encodings.
> >
> > LGTM, so I will go ahead and push this to all branches.
>
> I see that this was done, but this isn't the actual fix for this
> issue, right? Is somebody going to apply the main fix patch (perhaps
> just to master)?
Right -- the cosmetic encnames.c comment cleanup is what Thomas
pushed; the actual verifier fix is still pending. Tatsuo gave a +1
for preserving JOHAB and applying the verifier correction.
Thomas may have other priorities right now. This is not urgent on my
end, so I am content to wait for him.
Thanks,
Henson
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
In-Reply-To: <CAAAe_zDuTVCQuLnZv827yR2uAx+fgSixeWa+gvEgtSgQe_M28A@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox