Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mY9k2-0003aj-36 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 16:26:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mY9k0-0000DU-TV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 16:26:00 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mY9k0-0000Cl-6s for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 16:26:00 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mY9jt-0007E5-8c for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 16:25:58 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id p1so2803217pfh.8 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:25:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enterprisedb.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SHGTu7ACglsZQVBX1VSmI8pAfx5SolLc+LxVi1JNxyo=; b=CNxnbW6qwmomVv5WovpodIBZW+bpPxZ8mPn6O3tUi4ngNkLang+Hb5xkqYO0Gkm9s0 O46IZgEH0j2W3kaPZ5kXtEWN8MipNRK6D+Xacimt6/R9ocPukCJ4I3gmrJbxBVGcmj8S AbdEGjpR8M3Uivif2zhtNaGhvPIaXSdAsEhl92dnR/a+3Q9dttiMvEQZPbBwf+MlHoYz jHCMvYX7YES/Sg76veBmxsypUVEmrrp4e/0cdwCiupGGYqJV3MTlevzXOjMYXO4UnFSk bwcq0tXjxoxt5HYyM9yBMYooGh3tc3JiLt0y2BdFDTPLP8a6O/eQrpECOEe7Wir3f+3j evsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SHGTu7ACglsZQVBX1VSmI8pAfx5SolLc+LxVi1JNxyo=; b=rhVRRlGHBBHeFa+lufqcB2Xhe/6PNfy1ox2X60oVmicTNSzNszMv7XX9atg5dr7gBN BBqt6rUTseBmiVA5uJfjUDCvFM+3sSvhFPiHLcyalMraPhv+tBM3p8e4YWLbQJB0NIow nL7FVcs/rhfEHoFxJuKVp03zMq3qKW7aI+0mxGkr0KNWfC6dQfyaJGC6ZegDmA1JD5n1 VL7zVsEk87vMic5TZcrniy4a/tRV2nPKGqV6A8RnoQ4tGSSw+7jz2Q/406t7M4kAz2pr 0BjgFKHvZqeeVHC750zrt8fZJ4xxtTw/+vqnFDcAnD1DaFEFVBFWyy09Xq3CgG+N7WLE 9xYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lNhMV3wZ2PJTZe/vW0NdlHTxSd7a/tUFADsyqah1aHDWf+x24 dUU5vscupvkYHIjqSp8prt2hcU2gaLoTQ745kEin9zroEUKp5BreOuHvDZWUh5RhcO2KMT7/NuN fhJAJA+tBoXjhyJ92ZZToN+f1nvu4mvOf4bTKdxT11WPsrK2k8TXY4f8XWXEeMRiRckBXQj0UR2 ZoFRwKg5tIxwmqxy45puOfX91deYT5W2KdnNiK X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkPairoMun0USfDsatsYnWg4ChRUveoM7qNR87YP6Bs4uvXLjvKRxDyQ+IugfsQpL9VKPQNA== X-Received: by 2002:a65:664f:: with SMTP id z15mr21254870pgv.252.1633537551960; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop280-ma-us.hitronhub.home (24-113-193-150.wavecable.com. [24.113.193.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i5sm9823687pfk.170.2021.10.06.09.25.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations From: Mark Dilger In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:25:49 -0700 Cc: Peter Geoghegan , Alexander Lakhin , Robert Haas , PostgreSQL-development Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <17212-34dd4a1d6bba98bf@postgresql.org> <28B36E41-1E8F-4DC1-A924-711621BA4972@enterprisedb.com> <386F66EE-DEFD-42EA-9DB2-102BF3414669@enterprisedb.com> To: Pavel Borisov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Info: enterprisedb,google_mail,monitor X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Sent: true X-Gm-Spam: 0 X-Gm-Phishy: 0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On Oct 6, 2021, at 8:14 AM, Pavel Borisov = wrote: >=20 > We've looked through the initial patch and the exclusion of temporary = tables from pg_amcheck seems the right thing. Also it is not the matter = anyone disagrees here, and we propose to commit it alone. Thanks for reviewing! I expect to post a new version shortly.=20 =E2=80=94 Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company