Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsUL-0003JP-8G for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:23:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsUK-0006ou-66 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:23:04 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsUI-0006on-PD for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:23:03 +0000 Received: from [66.111.4.27] (helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ktsUG-00077P-2R for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:23:01 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6724B5C0048; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:22:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:22:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=sPSg//q7B3RBTrNBIKi5WPFcyVH LB8hrtig+zT9iuAY=; b=m4tY1T9XO2RZHP3jpdZu6BTFSqwAbRw7Jfm0wxG7RIu wIYcZP13zOJnVlHX2hIrhBOipRa4f32rYKdX5cbLSfP9gxX/joU30lc+/4K+iezJ Sb2/A3e7z+jDdGQ0YVdO4tJPfr1q9WwAcJaBlzATEU/RFL9rXut0pwr5uScmG8Xe QwuLzSYslzLcKUquBfy7Ov1wjPqu9vEw3ImwIa2RP7J3QkJDfhWNUFChUpY88gQu WYRllkxnbPPht5kqMX2Po8eoAA/hMbpKGmpuiOV0YFlkZRgAycY/sZKf0ZB8oEmE P/OAvCUOGiAqXG8rxrZASWtu2/1BIZlfIik8RiQPDGg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=sPSg// q7B3RBTrNBIKi5WPFcyVHLB8hrtig+zT9iuAY=; b=LkaMB7FdZx5M2VrFw7upZ9 bY+k1BD57h/M3oumGqx1a5zldb4o91EmzIYFJ/pIOAR9N/IIN/OMApxs73Bp2wji Pasm5LR68+0b9lSexQ5SHxfvIx/P+C5oOziKl3+rJaof19aGkHgsdvRDIfIytSjY hgjLkfv8+lU0c4qZq2SxaJwaXbZI5bA0zT35x3hH+Qt7bkugXqBxWWUDdiEs/uRn quMM4qe4Y6nOndb69AyVD+lOxgco3REWB5fxcy6x+SaSZWJP9xquvqoKLiVZIe8Q H+C5oEHMm+vU3nObiZQRXO/6WLOkByakrMfnmJmwecwOUcnbYib/nZHImLEgpFuA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdduledgheegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprg hquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvgeduuefhtdeuleettdevjeeh heeiveeuieegleetgeeljeelieeuieehgeevhfenucfkphepudduuddruddtvddrudektd drudekheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A72031080063; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:22:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 22:22:42 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Konstantin Knizhnik Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Large objects and out-of-memory Message-ID: References: <7c57860c-fc05-143e-aa81-f11ca13ec00a@postgrespro.ru> <543675.1608575245@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8044c223-4d3a-2cdb-42bf-29940840ce94@postgrespro.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LY/1o1rESithP6Qf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 66.111.4.27 (deferred) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --LY/1o1rESithP6Qf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 10:51:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Good catch. It is very easy to miss that this is not "rm", but "sn". > I have checked the rest of this area and did not notice similar > errors. I'll backpatch the attached if there are no objections. Applied this one with 643428c & co. -- Michael --LY/1o1rESithP6Qf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl/p3CIACgkQnvQgOdby QH2pBg/+NeptZvtsT378YYZulu25MCPs6EWdduuJeGqfH6ph1XSz9t6JfUC/BM/6 u0esh3U5/bgOBIXztUFXqyOCZg3Uae+lrIpytY1OakLpA0H7LvbfndwfGfe7jdhm Cl+6DOgVMU2egXU/mCWvmntOM+N90aP+lL65dA/PKYZs/j9/oCWjdvtPA5H2qvTm esHN9oVEWGbu3BY6vJcxEtQk1lfiCQxRozySAPx5OhDQaHOwuY5mbwX/szl6ET1H A+/6yTh9C5KY5JxXV3W5qATJexhA40gH135O3LvXg7Sq8tjA5wDtXh/2nB85GE5r LK7YotH5wZ9L6DtnsaAtZMPNwEMaitFB0VNgAAOaYtqsZvvuublSUTOIZHfwzdMH /eOoapVvEbEe28IGzNeDIMRwhEbKS2wHcdxgZi4QX6DbgaxLvM/Farsu8ghHzGs+ wXhcpO7PAbRHp8K4qMFH3fEQ6l15ER6T+WNeOKeJeJRQWkRFLei39JNRjkZAwh9Y LfMNNo1fOpQkGaVS6LWN6NlBthuPiU6eSqQr+O8W9iUe7YnV4gNf7orPkl2gnM4W cZ496Bos/6/jaMaPqdp+Wv0nEVHqavJ4Dgpjqutg+nA8uLvYQWqJDxC8L7YyIHjG vlsytu/OOgPCeb5Zqzj3k7ibYL1Yz0hycrmkIb2pVYczpkeX+AY= =iBTm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LY/1o1rESithP6Qf--