Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLyuD-0003b0-Ra for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 01:53:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLyuC-0001VC-L2 for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 01:53:56 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLyuB-0001Uy-GH for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 01:53:56 +0000 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLyu7-0004mi-CI for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 01:53:54 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7E75C005A; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 21:53:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Mar 2021 21:53:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=1UZ8C38A/Y93kRz/x1ifF7Hhhv/ gl1gZYVDqACkMLeA=; b=NShMbYIhnOj+rpjGjUDwgK4K0XIoVIOCdTXOpWN4iAl sDwpEyodfJsZ4Efjlmg11MArfFlN/rEFFx5rmRThubTZvX3F5lE8vOyn84az6TGm ugs2FTybXvaUQofQbOdnOP0QBRl5DU7AyB4q/BA5gB+3zOVXXLvqAVi1ftSaDc3Y jWWAC+b5vVDaSAs4nsgBjfx/bzRjLNiDfZXfz41cl6EY1N39fegKz3heiM4JShyJ 2ZN6gKHJ2H+EvGYNUf+sNzCzVXEZdiNNKNr2TYrlZnfV1JV7UwRsQAk+9mQLg4F7 pVzbBu3dwCI3lysoCl8fx2OXmGI0vw8nc8TEw8Rn/dw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=1UZ8C3 8A/Y93kRz/x1ifF7Hhhv/gl1gZYVDqACkMLeA=; b=CiP+CPoznpckjdriUqbjJb Wt0QcEaBgLaj2vHB+ZxMiUegtC+3znYWEcfhOr2r0oGOKzqUUDRZp0CRQ2Og3HtB x6arqn5CbPjFiSQjITGrLLWuRXrlqHjRC/kOkbz8loBmcNWne56CgyCFZppYUBIQ IUbfFY0fg6cRvQas0eCdsMfr4xiOJCU9c9YvTQbW3llU/vdSPsPg7OYRsPDy3NiD qtAQ0QoXHAW0oDuz13s6Z/tFwIfZdGhFlUwzrrc+c9Ap/JejQhrmvZtpkTdfE1aR XWIGBLfvKeI9LELc3uquMmbzt1pVlLrCWmaxBY0EKlUi5oINgjlNqlNQSuycQA/g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudefuddgfeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhf fvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhu ihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrh hnpedvgeduuefhtdeuleettdevjeehheeiveeuieegleetgeeljeelieeuieehgeevhfen ucfkphepudduuddruddtvddrudektddrudekheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E45A624005D; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 21:53:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:53:46 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: yarik97.6@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files Message-ID: References: <16927-67c570d968c99567@postgresql.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OlzKlGKEvU9rE2kp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --OlzKlGKEvU9rE2kp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:20:20AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Are all those instances involved with streaming replication? What is > exactly the version of your Windows server? d726e44f catches my > eyes here, looking at the diffs between both versions.. And... While stressing my Windows box with a pgbench this morning, I have been able to reproduce the problem on HEAD after 20 minutes of run, and my box is just an old VM image provided by Microsoft that has no fancy scanner running concurrently as far as I know. No replication involved here, just a standalone deployment. I'll look at what I have. -- Michael --OlzKlGKEvU9rE2kp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAmBQD6oACgkQnvQgOdby QH2bRA/+Jv/oRbaMAV8tjZI/u+9fhEtFuqcTLHRI5ZPNPBPaeHPp6BPeeDEbECMn r/C0ejmNQC9ZU8ZB2eOu8j3FEz1FpO+SOE2YqZimXpSIO64DFBkyQbsE/vFrguIQ mVNOE3xXNJsQHNGP/fn6rM9D/CPP0Gt0gdpduddD3+f8GamivhG6qWHKLUgtl2KR nX6H6W8TPlWiG91ScryWL7W7qmOIpJt4ZuLyX8FDrTH59kfrUztVBn1dn6E/lOCN fup5j2hR6kj4PypbesAARIxkQwvbSiK2Gms+Exo2LrQYn14u62oaLj+KPnzrem/L dnB+In5xlyqTASEnFq12K/6odcV70YSqWrod8PMdFoPtuJ3Dxf35HEU3W3OIHn1i mpUe1MWDBU0Uf8AKPY241kbTcNv9eTE3bAhN0T4zQOhBOGbNHBngmgOHfn9YVv32 R2KFb0+2d1hH1p6NYRniOt5jASwAGCJN48MsaLl8I5vvHipRq+d92ysLiVLRc+i/ MvgyVHBFWJSDA/P2YeJtd0FabQn5VYWk7tfBlu3qqv+C+ODs+Fi8r4HJHCBTDXZP WjJ5+BTKPvWiViiH2SASwaSWJ58T9xp0PASCKh4LJETMCTLq1bntx3u3zAwbirRJ iVexffE2ostfFel6mnN85lhh1CiV9AA6DSS06sGlORifffmLxiE= =cSXM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OlzKlGKEvU9rE2kp--