Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:50:19 -0600
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	adam@labkey.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer
 than 63 characters now fails
Message-ID: <Z0db25rMTSFrK-FN@nathan>
References: <Z0A2o+dS0MqDE2Fs@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <659706.1732303427@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <Z0DjJbJV4ZWkLuQd@nathan>
 <665338.1732306066@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <Z0Dmw1ryKH8bEkyo@nathan>
 <Z0c9XVU6aTd8neRr@nathan>
 <1865227.1732723416@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <Z0dKd7bvo3D2NdLt@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
 <Z0dNyskuXOCM-dOz@nathan>
 <Z0daSnNI8FrrSvhW@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Z0daSnNI8FrrSvhW@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z0db25rMTSFrK-FN%40nathan>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 05:43:38PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Regarding the question, the report that lead to the initial discussion was coming
> from a real case from an internal team. 562bee0fc1 did not fix it though but at
> least provides a consistent behavior between ASCII and non-ASCII.

It may be more consistent, but if it didn't fix the issue for that user,
and it's breaking things for other users, then the added consistency seems
to have helped no one.

-- 
nathan