Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsBKP-00GCCq-3g for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 01:56:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsBKL-00BOgJ-Io for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 01:56:09 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsBKL-00BOfu-9P for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 01:56:09 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tsBKG-002Kdk-36 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 01:56:07 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=momjian.us; s=2025010100; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description; bh=7AJP+GT6IVFXAg6BclXmA8jNyJuw87gqOIzGxnp+Lgk=; b=eS6Tv /tyrU6Kus9fOH4Zh51QDkSyFS+Rc5kDRPl1C+syE0QaJMBW6euGYOztzsSahnj7/xRW7Wm5dLlawt Jc28nQjWae0Yvef6mRZtWEyirxO3XBZPC8DXBnxtqGPVizgA9XjvWIHGVUMek78xTEZB+lNfJYTrZ 5dc7iDZE3gtaHy4fq0XFH8EV7bOSO/U4aZfx2mWZ7y2A2NH+gZ0poZec0suE76+wYUM+YhdIWZDmn nMInTBNCPyVjKGZ1JEPXrAim8yIxIYTzI5yxnZeKiUnA3FdHKqm35o4GOjI8waMBJsW8MbP43/0NM K/xUipMjyr0uZglWZcZfxw3A4JPFg==; Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tsBKF-008SNs-1Z; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 21:56:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 21:56:03 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: Richard Guo , David Rowley , Ronald Cruz , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Peter Ford , "Aaron J. Garcia" Subject: Re: Query result differences between PostgreSQL 17 vs 16 Message-ID: References: <2337383.1740630494@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2748914.1740757698@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3650809.1741015351@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1837979.1741731589@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1856323.1741741026@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1856323.1741741026@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 08:57:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Well, I was trying to figure out if we should be changing the NULL > > handling in 17.X, but now that you have done it with one patch, it seems > > the above URL patch should also be applied and backpatched to 17, no? > > If you want somebody to review that patch, shouldn't it be in the CF? Uh, I wasn't sure if it would make it in the next minor release if I did that. Is it a good idea? -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.