Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:05:34 +0200
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
Sender: depesz@depesz.com
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: anudeepvattikonda0404@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18956: Observing an issue in regexp_count()
Message-ID: <aEreruE-8drtSsKt@depesz.com>
Reply-To: depesz@depesz.com
References: <18956-9169151921910054@postgresql.org>
 <aErDmEWoyiNrhY1M@depesz.com>
 <1203062.1749736486@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1203062.1749736486@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aEreruE-8drtSsKt%40depesz.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 09:54:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 08:03:25AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> >> I am trying to run the below query
> >> select REGEXP_COUNT('cat at the flat', '\Bat\b') ;
> >> I was expecting it to return 2 but I see Postgres is returning 0. I see that
> >> there are two matches, cat and flat. All it should do is to look for the
> >> word at whose left side shoudn't be a word boundary while the right side
> >> should be a word boundary
> 
> > What makes you think that \B/\b has anything to do with word boundary?
> 
> Indeed, they do not.
> 
> > As far as I can tell pg regexps have nothing related to word boundaries.
> 
> Sure we do, see "Regular Expression Constraint Escapes":
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-matching.html#POSIX-CONSTRAINT-ESCAPES-TABLE
> 
> Unfortunately, since these are all way outside the POSIX regexp
> standard, different systems have implemented these extensions
> differently.  I don't doubt that \B/\b mean word boundaries
> in some other system.

Oh, Missed that. Thanks.

So the regexp can be rewritten to:

=$ select REGEXP_COUNT('cat at the flat', '\Yat\M');
 regexp_count
──────────────
            2
(1 row)

Best regards,

depesz