Feedback-ID: ie3de48e3:Fastmail
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:04:48 +0200
From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: 'Vishal Prasanna' <vishal.g@zohocorp.com>,
	pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Assert failure in ReorderBufferReturnTXN during logical
 decoding due to leaked specinsert change
Message-ID: <ailfSO6tWX0toG-F@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <OS9PR01MB1214976C7D1C63B8748591CE6F557A@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ailfSO6tWX0toG-F%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On 2026-Mar-27, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:

> Dear Vishal,
> 
> I noticed commitfest app got angry your patch, but your patch could still be applied.
> Per my understanding, cfbot tried to apply all patches to master but failed.
> Here are fixed version, only suffix is changed for some patches.

Thanks.  As far as I can tell this is just a leak, right?  There's
nothing that misbehaves when assertions are disabled, even with
MEMORY_CONTEX_CHECKING -- it's just a small, very improbably mem leak.

I'm tempted not to touch REL_14_STABLE with it in that case.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I am amazed at [the pgsql-sql] mailing list for the wonderful support, and
lack of hesitasion in answering a lost soul's question, I just wished the rest
of the mailing list could be like this."                               (Fotis)
              https://postgr.es/m/200606261359.k5QDxE2p004593@auth-smtp.hol.gr