Feedback-ID: ie3de48e3:Fastmail
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:34:11 +0200
From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: Li Japin <japinli@hotmail.com>
Cc: Keith Paskett <keith.paskett@logansw.com>,
	"pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?5Zue5aSNOiBwZ19yZXN0b3I=?= =?utf-8?Q?e?= error with
 partitioned table having exclude constraint
Message-ID: <al49T7fl9EKWEPB_@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <ME0P300MB044553E723ED88E4B4C7FC82B691A@ME0P300MB0445.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/al49T7fl9EKWEPB_%40alvherre.pgsql>
Precedence: bulk

On 2025-May-14, Li Japin wrote:

> Apologies for the delay.  Considering it further, ignoring ii_ExclusionProcs and
> ii_ExclusionStrats seems incorrect given custom operators.
> 
> I've also updated ii_NumIndexAttrs to ii_NumIndexKeyAttrs, as exclusion indexes
> won't exceed the ii_NumIndexKeyAttrs.
> 
> I've also moved the test cases to indexing.sql.  I'm unsure of its suitability, but seeing
> pg_dump/pg_upgrade tests prompted the move.

Thanks for updating it.  I agree that adding the tests to indexing.sql
is the right move.  I have polished the patch a bit more and pushed to
branches from 17 onwards.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/