Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nyskj-0007XE-SK for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 10:17:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nysjj-0002FH-VK for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 10:16:27 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nysjj-0002Dv-Mc for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 10:16:27 +0000 Received: from sfr-1.cri.mines-paristech.fr ([77.158.180.225] helo=smtp.cri.ensmp.fr) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nysjg-0004Zg-8m for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 10:16:26 +0000 Received: from laroche-adap.cri.ensmp.fr (laroche-adap.cri.ensmp.fr [10.2.14.39]) by smtp.cri.ensmp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33BD8C01AF; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 12:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 12:16:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Fabien COELHO X-X-Sender: fabien@pseudo To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Tom Lane , Alastair McKinley , PostgreSQL Bugs Subject: Re: psql 15beta1 does not print notices on the console until transaction completes In-Reply-To: <4d4b752e-3cfb-494c-86db-27b48f347280@enterprisedb.com> Message-ID: References: <3662994.1653856025@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4d4b752e-3cfb-494c-86db-27b48f347280@enterprisedb.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk >> My short term recommendation is to remove the attempt at keeping the >> notice/result order for a tradeoff of getting the notices as soon as they >> are emitted, i.e. basically patch 1 and the acceptance of the diffs, called >> 1-bis in the attached. > > I agree with this solution. Do you want to keep the tests, do you think they > are going to be stable? I suppose we could try and find out. I think that we should try to keep them, and remove them only if they are proven unstable, which may happen. The buildfarm will tell. -- Fabien.