Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8N0i-003lyM-Io for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:06:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8N0f-00GB3N-LM for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:06:30 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8N0f-00GB3F-C8 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:06:29 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8N0b-000M9z-9d for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:06:29 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7aa086b077so740682966b.0 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 09:06:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybertec.at; s=cybertec.at; t=1730826385; x=1731431185; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wDuHJvyFP3CSbcgFsECrJkei31S024rIjWKUbP9r6dY=; b=GHaJFtBDgT7F9QOSD2XgMm43SCDUewhU73fwBToUd70IU5dj/sazJHcLqrctFvgEJx covsQARL/x4wziz3nNuWjj2lI6Um2tAd6AgVu0M42BgCdgS8FtN6qXwlaJoIwL7s+6H4 PgTPENb8lokCyLcTufCxlYr8Kg+RaaqPABI8I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730826385; x=1731431185; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wDuHJvyFP3CSbcgFsECrJkei31S024rIjWKUbP9r6dY=; b=wXpKZb3mnvaDWYUn9PyeqOQdInvMsg2fSRq4GyIU/lfmcOly8DCXIRN5qoDSH0XwiV eSuGXFqUnAmdzVcAmjLTM+zxXudGHo4pIajJ44gKBEpmRsyRJR91D1wS9GqONOgaLhY/ wMDJGCLuD7WhrJ2sLjKzq/92PcPBrt9j1BtAZIUCRHA5zw54+gAs2SmQ3ME3MmugaAAj BhfzCw1sXg+cAr0jiITcl3WCybxqXRp8iWog5YH+nXU9S76+XQewFB6SyFDpz8l4b4io 8uVy+PzRWGiGgiuRMbzh2ZrpqEdr8YX1mesjff48rgx7Of648fngB+OJYVD9qUwQG49E DDsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyHuCgJ/SziU4FrkQTiCJA/1bdbf7NzKIYSsBgoUc+U3fbB9VpG kmK3c5M7FswrMJmR3TyyWy60H+R1fQzHSxpAQgWSutGXVZx57fWa2LJ3uCGJgFo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErcmUMYiElelFM/ddZ7qvnPn1O9DoW7FTLLXsjYZIXhf1ftujTyW42w+jr/yuA4SOSXFQgZg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dc91:b0:a9a:4f78:c3 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a9e3a5a0da3mr2404021666b.21.1730826385106; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 09:06:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([46.226.60.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a9eb17ceaa2sm158365466b.132.2024.11.05.09.06.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 09:06:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: BUG #18685: -> Does the similar bug affect executable "pg_dump" too in Ver 17.0 From: Laurenz Albe To: Bharani SV-forum , "nuko.yokohama@gmail.com" , Tom Lane Cc: "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:06:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <749602451.2951310.1730823617713@mail.yahoo.com> References: <18685-fee2dd142b9688f1@postgresql.org> <2887158.1730749223@sss.pgh.pa.us> <749602451.2951310.1730823617713@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.4 (3.52.4-2.fc40) MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 16:20 +0000, Bharani SV-forum wrote: > Does the similar bug affect,=C2=A0 executable "pg_dump" too in Ver 17.0 According to the commit message https://postgr.es/c/e2a9129093 pg_dump is not affected. > On Monday, November 4, 2024 at 02:40:34 PM EST, Tom Lane wrote:=20 >=20 > PG Bug reporting form writes: >=20 > > In PostgreSQL 16, pg_basebackup could be run without prompting for a > > password. > > However, when running pg_basebacup on PostgreSQL 17, the user is prompt= ed > > for a password even if .pgpass is set. >=20 >=20 > Yup, that's a bug.=C2=A0 Fix pushed, thanks for the report! Yours, Laurenz Albe