Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEP2x-007Vhl-OS for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 09:02:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEP2w-00Ea22-SD for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 09:02:02 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEP2w-00EZzQ-Jv for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 09:02:02 +0000 Received: from oss.nttdata.com ([49.212.34.109]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uEP2t-001OxM-0g for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 12 May 2025 09:02:01 +0000 Received: from [192.168.11.2] (p1696134-ipoe.ipoe.ocn.ne.jp [118.0.93.133]) by oss.nttdata.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42985613DD; Mon, 12 May 2025 18:01:54 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at oss.nttdata.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 18:01:53 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: reltuples decreasing with each autovacuum run To: =?UTF-8?B?5r+x5LitIOW8mOWSjA==?= , "David G. Johnston" Cc: "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" References: Content-Language: en-US From: Fujii Masao In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 2025/05/02 15:16, 濱中 弘和 wrote: > Dear David J, > Mr. Masao Fujii, > > I apologize for the time that has passed, > but it would be helpful if you could update me on the current situation to determine the future operational policy. > > I understand that this issue has a low priority and is unlikely to be addressed in the near future. > > Could you please confirm if this understanding is correct? I don't think this issue is low priority. However, we haven't reached consensus on any proposed solution yet, and there hasn't been enough discussion on how to address it. Do you have any thoughts on how we might solve this? What do you think about the two ideas I suggested earlier? Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION