Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wfOfg-005QeV-1e for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2026 21:10:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wfOfd-00395I-2u for pgsql-bugs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2026 21:10:05 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wfOfd-003959-1w for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2026 21:10:05 +0000 Received: from smtpout17.a1.net ([194.48.128.1]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wfOfb-00000001Own-20w7 for pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2026 21:10:05 +0000 Received: from laurenz.albe-K4N0CV00F97414D (178-190-179-136.adsl.highway.telekom.at [178.190.179.136]) by smtpout17.a1.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4grqJy5rVFzGrqnn; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 23:09:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aon.at; s=resmail1; t=1783026600; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fkCAkCWpa4Kr733Qn3MBKsAdsAX7mLhCHaKGP2yB1JM=; b=qxESZ65ZDWbG1qPVhUY/5fmpb7sPlidhZ0vmh4yqlZ58l2wyGS69UHrIEs4ssgz/K7sy3+ exvS6AtRL5ynnThhPRbTLJFw3pPHWvix4aAAKHhyloGYpJpoxsOjO+gk+cAbZlkNCf0bnp m3nstFnIXkRin4qUPzt1Me2C1Z83DBNYUk+6hVuXW0uQAnLFey7S/V52nYWEOIxEhe+VTU 3kGWYVvcpEghhNlQrxAYHyJPl8GNx5aspiirBzUoHaWGBWzyXsZfAVJ0b4TToJYx8jd18E CjAIG9O7E75YZ5ezlPS2n4ajWGCFuLsxVliCS6Ep36QtRDF28ptO4Rdh/rltcrIAiSy7rk tQe9D58KrLRqZlPw71YJ8AJVx1iVtBN6tSEa17CsVYfq8dP41+Uhe7/S5nMQ1HmgRctuz9 c8P+WZkQ4aRNg6Y/eUCchzRDYDNSs9XnFS1rnsPRhF0EzqDc/pQPDlCOvxjx6O505xZ+Aj aJUdFNeo2D1VIBEB00X8YYdhQpMn6XJdWLQvBScRtJxEq3Y6vocKKA0zuLO0q7XYEKd1iZ /1OVos/ORGaxyhqiDRcdv/uBsyu/73CRfymSE2ZvooGxjd5W3xIL+D9oHtE/Y2i++PHHT/ 1JUTxsbnk3KQQARUEOV6DW5CM6vWOZAzJIb+QdQCsdOZ9x378tYfw= Message-ID: Subject: Re: BUG #19483: pg_upgrade fails with orphan records in pg_init_priv catalog table From: Laurenz Albe To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=FCseyin?= Demir Cc: Tom Lane , Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 23:09:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <19483-80de42dc4e62cfd6@postgresql.org> <104812.1780847519@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5184088806e70ed5db7e83bd6540a016b3802c1d.camel@cybertec.at> <0d7531c192859057c6aad54c89a8d453376bd00c.camel@cybertec.at> <592839.1782153054@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Level: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Fri, 2026-06-26 at 10:30 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > I'd say that your v6 patch is fine if the performance impact can be > shown to be small. To keep the ball rolling, I ran a pg_upgrade --link from a debug-enabled build on a database with 20000 empty tables. pg_upgrade took between 19 and 25 minutes, and I saw no noticeable effect of the patch. So I guess this is good to go. Yours, Laurenz Albe