public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Messages from [email protected] Re: Fix size estimation for parallel B-Tree scans with skip arrays 2026-04-29 16:08 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Fix size estimation for parallel B-Tree scans with skip arrays 2026-04-29 14:43 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: PG17.6 wal apply bug (SIGSEGV) 2025-10-22 17:01 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: PG17.6 wal apply bug (SIGSEGV) 2025-10-20 17:18 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #19082: Failing assert in index scan 2025-10-10 18:22 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #19082: Failing assert in index scan 2025-10-10 18:10 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #19082: Failing assert in index scan 2025-10-10 16:28 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #19082: Failing assert in index scan 2025-10-10 15:40 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-09-26 17:02 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-09-25 19:46 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-09-25 18:45 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #19049: Assert failure when using skip arrays on an index key with DESC order 2025-09-12 01:07 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #19049: Assert failure when using skip arrays on an index key with DESC order 2025-09-11 17:16 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #19049: Assert failure when using skip arrays on an index key with DESC order 2025-09-11 16:48 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #19049: Assert failure when using skip arrays on an index key with DESC order 2025-09-11 15:51 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-08-21 01:48 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-08-11 18:44 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-08-05 14:47 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-08-05 00:14 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-08-04 20:11 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-08-02 03:07 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-08-01 21:47 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-31 22:12 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-31 21:40 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-31 21:04 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-31 03:00 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-30 20:14 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-30 19:50 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-30 19:16 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-30 18:45 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-28 20:41 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-17 15:55 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15 2025-07-17 15:05 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Re: Re:Re:Re: backup server core when redo btree_xlog_insert that type is XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_POST 2025-01-12 22:43 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Dangling operator family after DROP TYPE 2024-12-06 18:36 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Re: Re:Re:Re: backup server core when redo btree_xlog_insert that type is XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_POST 2024-12-01 15:36 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Re:Re:Re: backup server core when redo btree_xlog_insert that type is XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_POST 2024-12-01 13:33 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: backup server core when redo btree_xlog_insert that type is XLOG_BTREE_INSERT_POST 2024-11-21 15:58 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Segmentation fault - PostgreSQL 17.0 2024-11-09 15:53 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Leader backend hang on IPC/ParallelFinish when LWLock held at parallel query start 2024-09-18 12:59 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #18490: Assert in comparetup_index_btree_tiebreak() fails when pg_class reindexed during a table creation 2024-06-02 15:19 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae 2024-05-28 06:38 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae 2024-05-17 04:28 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae 2024-05-16 20:37 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae 2024-05-16 20:13 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae 2024-05-16 16:49 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-05-02 16:52 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-04-26 22:20 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-04-26 21:28 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: FSM Corruption (was: Could not read block at end of the relation) 2024-04-11 16:01 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae 2024-03-29 17:16 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Index plan returns different results to sequential scan 2024-03-23 02:24 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: Index plan returns different results to sequential scan 2024-03-22 01:40 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-01-10 19:57 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-01-10 19:06 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #18279: Duplicate key violation and Deadlock when using ON CONFLICT/DO UPDATE with multiple unique indexes 2024-01-10 15:11 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-01-09 23:16 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-01-09 20:59 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-01-08 18:36 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-01-08 17:02 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-01-06 21:41 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() 2024-01-06 21:30 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx 2023-10-24 01:23 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx 2023-10-24 00:45 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx 2023-10-23 22:15 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx 2023-10-23 19:01 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx 2023-10-23 18:49 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #18124: PG16 release note document bug in "Add build option to allow testing of small WAL segment sizes" 2023-09-22 02:07 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #18124: PG16 release note document bug in "Add build option to allow testing of small WAL segment sizes" 2023-09-22 01:55 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: group by true now errors with non-integer constant in GROUP BY 2023-09-21 04:58 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17798: Incorrect memory access occurs when using BEFORE ROW UPDATE trigger 2023-05-01 04:04 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17798: Incorrect memory access occurs when using BEFORE ROW UPDATE trigger 2023-04-30 20:39 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17855: Uninitialised memory used when the name type value processed in binary mode of Memoize 2023-03-23 04:27 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> Re: BUG #17855: Uninitialised memory used when the name type value processed in binary mode of Memoize 2023-03-23 03:25 UTC Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> 74+ results
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox