From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix arrays comparison in CompareOpclassOptions()
In-reply-to: 
 <CAPpHfdtnhCJ7S5SkyqcBWL3RrbTV32nfP_LVQ6uuYw1sPEYDJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E1tAeNA-001NSD-8l@gemulon.postgresql.org>
 <1072778.1731370160@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAPpHfdtnhCJ7S5SkyqcBWL3RrbTV32nfP_LVQ6uuYw1sPEYDJA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
	message dated "Tue, 12 Nov 2024 02:45:32 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <1079376.1731373850.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:10:50 -0500
Message-ID: <1079377.1731373850@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1079377.1731373850%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:09 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Umm ... you do realize we're still in release freeze?

> Oh, I specially visited the wiki page, but misread the sentence on
> when the release freeze stops.  Obviously yes, tags aren't pushed,
> that are just stamps.  And that's not February 13th.
> Sorry for this.  Let me know if I can do something to fix this.

Well, unless we need a re-wrap due to packager complaints, it
won't make a difference.  If we do need a re-wrap, we'll have
to decide whether to temporarily revert this or to include it
in the re-wrapped versions.  The patch looks safe enough that
probably including it would be okay ... but that was not the
plan.

I don't feel a need to make a decision about that unless it
becomes necessary, though.

			regards, tom lane