Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mkKHB-0005yq-6G for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 06:06:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mkKH9-00065J-Bb for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 06:06:31 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mkKH9-00065A-4T for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 06:06:31 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mkKH6-0001oP-96 for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 06:06:30 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1A966QjG1103687; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 01:06:26 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix incorrect format placeholder. In-reply-to: References: <1100878.1636435176@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:38:40 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1103685.1636437986.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 01:06:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1103686.1636437986@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:19:36AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Umm ... florican and dangomushi spotted it. Maybe we need a 32-bit >> machine with -Werror? > Indeed, I can see it in the logs of dangomushi. I could add a -Werror > there, but there are also a bunch of warnings generated by plperl. Yeah, we had complaints before about -Wcompound-token-split-by-macro warnings. > I'd rather keep --with-perl and clang, and there seems to be a fix > regarding that stuff in upstream: > https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.changes/2021/07/msg57758.html I figured the Perl guys would do something about it, but it will be a very long time before that propagates everywhere. Maybe we should teach configure to add -Wno-compound-token-split-by-macro? By my count there are now five buildfarm members besides dangomushi that are producing these warnings, and I think the number is going to go up before it goes down. (Meanwhile, I guess I could enable -Werror on florican.) regards, tom lane