Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1cTw-00DZ1E-Ui for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1cTu-003ASb-FZ for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:31 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1cTu-003AST-8O for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:31 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s1cTs-000loP-ON for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:40:30 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 43U1eQ3L1539987; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:40:27 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: David Rowley cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix test case from b0c5b215d. In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley message dated "Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:39:02 +1200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1539985.1714441226.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:40:26 -0400 Message-ID: <1539986.1714441226@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk David Rowley writes: > Still failing for me and [1]. > Maybe: > SELECT pg_describe_object(classid,objid,objsubid) COLLATE "C" AS obj, > Gets me the results in the expected order. I committed that suggestion, but I'm not sure it's enough to fix it, because if I do LANG=cs_CZ.utf8 make check then I still get variant output order. I tried about six different spellings of the query without improving matters, so I'm totally baffled. Have we managed to break COLLATE "C"? (With one eye on Jeff Davis' recent stuff, I could believe that, except I'd have expected it to show up in other regression tests already.) I'll await buildfarm results, but there's something odd here. regards, tom lane