Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vUpvE-0084vO-2C for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2025 17:30:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vUpvC-00Dmvr-1s for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2025 17:30:15 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vUpvC-00Dmvj-1A for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2025 17:30:15 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vUpvB-000eSL-2N for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2025 17:30:14 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5BEHUBD81579531; Sun, 14 Dec 2025 12:30:11 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alexander Korotkov cc: pgsql-committers Subject: Re: pgsql: Add a regression test to verify that NLS translation works. In-reply-to: <1577647.1765732692@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <1577647.1765732692@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Sun, 14 Dec 2025 12:18:12 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1579529.1765733411.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 12:30:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1579530.1765733411@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > Alexander Korotkov writes: >> I noticed couple of buildfarm failures on bumblebee and akepa. > Yeah, I'm kind of expecting some given what we already found ... It looks like acceptable LC_MESSAGES values are more variable than the previous testing suggested. I'm going to try putting in some code to try a few different spellings of "es_ES". If that doesn't help, I'll have to revert and rethink. regards, tom lane