From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Reject SSL connection if ALPN is used but there's no
 common prot
In-reply-to: <adc3ebc2-0e3a-4983-bec1-637182b60aae@iki.fi>
References: <E1s1Si1-000dPK-6j@gemulon.postgresql.org>
 <1452995.1714433552@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <adc3ebc2-0e3a-4983-bec1-637182b60aae@iki.fi>
Comments: In-reply-to Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
	message dated "Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:19:53 +0300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1581211.1714454818.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:26:59 -0400
Message-ID: <1581212.1714454819@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1581212.1714454819%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> On 30/04/2024 02:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A moderately large fraction of the buildfarm doesn't seem to
>> recognize SSL_AD_NO_APPLICATION_PROTOCOL.

> *sigh*. I checked that it exists on OpenSSL 1.1.1, but according to 
> buildfarm it's not present on OpenSSL 1.0.2 or LibreSSL. I'll add an 
> #ifdef guard. OpenSSL 1.0.2 support is about to be removed from master, 
> and, and we can live with a a poor error message on LibreSSL. It's not 
> something that users should normally hit.

WFM.  Thanks!

			regards, tom lane