Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vdJpE-00GfnE-2t for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 03:03:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vdJpD-00BVQ0-1n for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 03:03:08 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vdJpD-00BVPs-13 for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 03:03:08 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vdJpB-0050Pv-1T for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 03:03:07 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 607331w61656710; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 22:03:01 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Add data type oid8, 64-bit unsigned identifier In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Wed, 07 Jan 2026 02:39:16 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1656708.1767754981.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 22:03:01 -0500 Message-ID: <1656709.1767754981@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > Add data type oid8, 64-bit unsigned identifier sifaka doesn't like this, evidently because it uses -DSTRESS_SORT_INT_MIN. Personally I'd just drop those tests of btoid8cmp --- what are they going to catch that's not caught by other tests? regards, tom lane