Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f5tbk-0003ri-Ml for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:46:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f5tbj-0004k9-D5 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:46:47 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f5tbj-0004jt-5x for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:46:47 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f5tbb-0006pR-IH for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:46:46 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3ADkWI8017166; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:46:32 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Julien Rouhaud cc: Michael Paquier , Postgres hackers Subject: Re: pgsql: Merge catalog/pg_foo_fn.h headers back into pg_foo.h headers. In-reply-to: References: <20180409010031.GA11599@paquier.xyz> <16609.1523243109@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20180409061354.GD1740@paquier.xyz> <6629.1523294509@sss.pgh.pa.us> <17755.1523306794@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Julien Rouhaud message dated "Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:08:16 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <17164.1523367992.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:46:32 -0400 Message-ID: <17165.1523367992@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Julien Rouhaud writes: > Compilation of external extensions using PGXS appears to be broken > since this commit: Ouch, sorry. > I think the best fix if to define NO_GENERATED_HEADERS in pgxs.mk, > patch attached. Hm. I wonder if we don't also want NO_TEMP_INSTALL, like the doc/src/sgml makefile. I don't know whether "make check" could be useful in a PGXS build, but certainly that recipe for making a temp install isn't gonna work. regards, tom lane