Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tIKwG-00DjO2-QF for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 04:55:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tIKwE-006tHy-5i for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 04:55:07 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tIKwD-006tHp-Ua for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 04:55:07 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tIKwC-000lZt-Go for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 04:55:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4B34t2Yj1732557; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 23:55:02 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: David Rowley cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Introduce CompactAttribute array in TupleDesc In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley message dated "Tue, 03 Dec 2024 17:10:19 +1300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1732555.1733201702.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 23:55:02 -0500 Message-ID: <1732556.1733201702@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk David Rowley writes: > I am looking at the buildfarm. It's fairly apparent that I've broken > something. I'm planning on reverting this shortly. Just a gut-level guess, but I'm wondering about something like uninitialized fields that happen to work as long as the memory was zero to start with. A run under valgrind might offer insight. regards, tom lane