Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iobSM-0006sy-DS for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:06:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iobSL-0005Bc-5l for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:06:41 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iobSK-0005BV-Nm for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:06:40 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iobSH-0002NR-FE for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:06:38 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 006N6SbC019974; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 18:06:28 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Christoph Berg cc: Andres Freund , Amit Kapila , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: pgsql: Add basic TAP tests for psql's tab-completion logic. In-reply-to: <20200106191303.GA3975@msg.df7cb.de> References: <20200103110128.GA28967@msg.df7cb.de> <13708.1578059577@sss.pgh.pa.us> <25771.1578249042@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20200106105608.GB18560@msg.df7cb.de> <3764.1578323719@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20200106191303.GA3975@msg.df7cb.de> Comments: In-reply-to Christoph Berg message dated "Mon, 06 Jan 2020 20:13:03 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <19972.1578351988.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 18:06:28 -0500 Message-ID: <19973.1578351988@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Christoph Berg writes: > Re: Tom Lane 2020-01-06 <3764.1578323719@sss.pgh.pa.us> >>> Does not work on Ubuntu bionic, xenial. (Others not tested.) >> Hmm ... do we care? The test output seems to show that xenial's >> 3.1-20150325-1ubuntu2 libedit is completely broken. Maybe there's >> a way to work around that, but it's not clear to me that that'd >> be a useful expenditure of time. You're not really going to be >> building PG13 for that release are you? > xenial (16.04) is a LTS release with support until 2021-04, and the > current plan was to support it. I now realize that's semi-close to the > 13 release date, but so far we have tried to really support all > PG-Distro combinations. I installed libedit_3.1-20150325.orig.tar.gz from source here, and it passes our current regression test and seems to behave just fine in light manual testing. (I did not apply any of the Debian-specific patches at [1], but they don't look like they'd explain much.) So I'm a bit at a loss as to what's going wrong for you. Is the test environment for Xenial the same as for the other branches? regards, tom lane [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libedit/3.1-20150325-1ubuntu2