Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rpVnC-0076OC-W1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:06:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rpVnC-00H2Mn-3r for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:06:22 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rpVnB-00H2MZ-N5 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:06:21 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rpVn9-006og6-3j for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:06:21 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6A630083F3 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:06:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from s980.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7152E2E58D; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:06:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from s470.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s980.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F322201702; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:06:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.21 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s470.loopia.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s979.loopia.se ([172.22.191.5]) by s470.loopia.se (s470.loopia.se [172.22.190.34]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5fh6wtNbI0Dz; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:06:17 +0100 (CET) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s979.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E8A810BC41B; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:06:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1711555577; bh=IuP2YO/fdzzUpxIBt1wpsTITD+o/L6jud24MYIk53oI=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=K1PyGcgSTaOcbVkdw4fE5mrfSuQ3iMh3K8pWp+cFUOQeNKhLrGCySTqcTVBDy5N8P 7HQh41UEvFCoIv0j/qZS/yGdQahI5jmlvWjjmz/I9RSWvMJn5qTbcT3Ed5DgVxkr1A 0X1MaCllwxYm+3di6TQ7ir5r6fMQIygQOJIdQ+u2rM/xsoEH4zOrJ3cNb+tqa3i8DD nrjW6+Wr1ePqOrlX+NUUAgIMuyXSWbHLbzT5PPXxWTghmISikjkJoeIlCGHWkoBPZJ 9LeDrwYtwTCXLc34l80UYoCj7dhqxlmBWCkvsi8CVWzz/vW9DrMWVZjWQkGY0y9+31 JSUnF0YOoJfQg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.4\)) Subject: Re: pgsql: Clean up role created in new subscription test. From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: <3308709.1711553163@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:06:17 +0100 Cc: Andres Freund , Peter Eisentraut , vignesh C , Alvaro Herrera , Robert Haas , PostgreSQL Hackers Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1BC3375D-951F-40CA-8D8F-A1E7CF007C57@yesql.se> References: <202312011219.aikuwve3cbku@alvherre.pgsql> <57373BD5-C0D9-486D-9096-276FE91411D7@yesql.se> <1ECB500B-F76F-4BBE-AE4D-91DDC5E59D7E@yesql.se> <20240325184824.uxbh6o7w4442o4nv@awork3.anarazel.de> <6BF8531D-355E-4D41-BA13-653505F97684@yesql.se> <3308709.1711553163@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.4) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 27 Mar 2024, at 16:26, Tom Lane wrote: >=20 > Daniel Gustafsson writes: >> The only option is to make the check opt-in via a command-line = parameter for >> use it in the main regress tests, and not use it for the contrib = tests. The >> attached v7 does that and passes CI, but I wonder if it's worth it = all with >> that restriction? >=20 > Yeah, that seems hardly worth it --- and it's only an accident of > implementation that we don't run the main tests in parallel with > something else, anyway. Too bad, but ... Agreed. The excercise did catch the leftovers in 0001 so I'll go ahead = with those before closing the CF entry. -- Daniel Gustafsson