Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ifST2-0000F3-7m for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:41:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ifST0-0002Gg-DW for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:41:34 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ifST0-0002GZ-3g for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:41:34 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ifSSx-0008NG-QF for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:41:33 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xBCHfQTC002002; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:41:26 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org, Andrew Dunstan Subject: Re: pgsql: Emit parameter values during query bind/execute errors In-reply-to: <20191212164720.GA27169@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20191212164720.GA27169@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:47:20 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2000.1576172486.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:41:26 -0500 Message-ID: <2001.1576172486@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > Hmm, the affected ones (jacana and fairywren only AFAICS) seem to be > gcc-based, which presumably work differently than the msvc-based in how > newlines are interpreted in the test script. I pushed an attempted > blind fix. > I *hope* that those two are not the only Windows ones running the > pgbench tap test! [ scrapes buildfarm results... ] The Windows critters that are running that test seem to be name | operating_system | compiler -----------+------------------+--------------- bowerbird | Windows | Visual Studio drongo | Windows | Visual Studio fairywren | Windows / Msys | gcc jacana | Windows | gcc So yeah, the MSVC ones were happy with the test as you had it. Interesting ... it's not obvious why that would have anything to do with the behavior of a Perl regexp. Maybe they are using a different Perl version? regards, tom lane