Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BADA6332FF for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:33:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48954-04 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:33:22 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7EB6343D0 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:33:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id n52IXLx26557; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:33:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200906021833.n52IXLx26557@momjian.us> Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix LOCK TABLE to eliminate the race condition that could make it In-Reply-To: <9820.1242162624@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:33:20 -0400 (EDT) CC: Simon Riggs , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.096 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.096 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200906/204 X-Sequence-Number: 139259 Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs writes: > > If we're going to require cascaded permissions like this, would it make > > sense to make GRANT cascade down the inheritance tree also? > > That's been discussed before. I forget whether we decided it was a good > idea or not, but in any case it looks like a new feature not a bug fix. Is this a TODO? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +