Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:20:58 -0300
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins.
Message-ID: <20180124202058.noigt47bony4rm7z@alvherre.pgsql>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEepm=1c7SpPfsFtFS0gJaPYXwLu=BpCi8WX3Ws7DsuVh1KzkQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306-137-4415bd-dirty (1.8.0)
Precedence: bulk

Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> > However, the trend over the last two months is very bad, and I do
> > not think that we can point to any large improvement in test
> > coverage that someone committed since November.
> 
> I'm not sure if coverage.postgresql.org has a way to view historical
> reports so we can see the actual percentage change,

It does not.  I have had that in my to-do list for a while, but haven't
gotten around to it.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services