Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fulfq-0006oJ-Rj for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:37:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fulfo-0002SK-KE for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:37:16 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fulfn-0002SD-Cr for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:37:16 +0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fulff-0000xA-5p for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:37:13 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CF921BBA; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:37:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:37:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=w+5dOk7x9Nfl8g8WNPVLsgzVfjOM+AfpVhJOQ0WjASU=; b=D2YhTNeB QBYAJPyz0Lshzpil5QuV9PueGVTjNeg9QTalQjPW0AsLuuzmnm1n08x6XNwJv6b3 WFjzalFm403VM1A23F5zZHhCuJc9AZ11+O+bGpGDZdIbwrxnakPMqgKmoGbd6vzD FrY7swEkXqHNcC1BsyDMpuGKKg85vLUiK5n/FNEOYEy6Q2oP94YaFjj3LZRV8AVh Ssy3IkVjKJvjSBQIlbXJ0OVkubmz8EonLQJqRtg5bOW0VdupC7riVGQwYSqG9tdJ GFf4no31HSR7mKlgnifRL5BFDBCZQIKhVNLTCGnGc1cEXHXmoptxR8/yxedr/0Pa 5DbbYcIYM13Qow== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=w+5dOk7x9Nfl8g8WNPVLsgzVfjOM+ AfpVhJOQ0WjASU=; b=m6JmuXGyzMpSRrOszp5xijGqklOjnJrxpn++A1sxLZvBc lFOu2U9fDFZQ5tN+pZZLwUasgCMnwVw+Ha4c8JLi0Ac8yrDNyC67137y+y0adoBC 9GQQXpOSJfmGNjKacj87+NJjZJ9TgAdMVNHaVNCsPQWGIgRKh9+8lJqEctiVRm0i p7AOtcAjLRHmqq0guxaGfrhS0l9AzB4drimWURTYjAAYlJTAKjAtoVfsr8HeCaMc dxMm59t4BYPjcgWzZoQ4n+8pzfDP9Se4W+2Yag3/eL8EH1al09CnV5hCapy6uPeM /adp+73+lhajiUH4AZfb9sqS1oRLELM/9aB6pYm4g== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from paquier.xyz (unknown [208.91.3.26]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 73D96E421C; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:37:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:37:01 -0700 From: Michael Paquier To: Tom Lane Cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Rework option set of vacuumlo Message-ID: <20180828213701.GL29157@paquier.xyz> References: <12438.1535488750@sss.pgh.pa.us> <17758.1535490505@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+ARLBH93C7pgvpZY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17758.1535490505@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --+ARLBH93C7pgvpZY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:08:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> Digging, this is because the "make check" processing isn't actually >> installing oid2name (resp. vacuumlo) into the temp installation tree :-(. >>=20 >> I don't think this is the fault of your tests, exactly --- there's >> something wrong in the existing make rules. I'm not sure what though. >> EXTRA_INSTALL should be getting set, according to pgxs.mk: >> temp-install: EXTRA_INSTALL+=3D$(subdir) >> but it evidently isn't. >=20 > Oh! The reason why not is that that line is inside "ifdef REGRESS", > and these subdirectories have no REGRESS tests. So we should move > that out to where it will apply regardless of that. Will fix. Yes, I was going to send a patch along the same lines as what you have just committed. Thanks! It looks that the binary was installed in my own PATH, so I did not notice it. This should definitely get back-patched in my opinion, I have similar problems with pg_rewind tests of 9.3 and 9.4 that I still maintain out of the core tree, where the main binary needs to be installed first. In this case I just used some Makefile trick. -- Michael --+ARLBH93C7pgvpZY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAluFwHwACgkQnvQgOdby QH3pxg/+NZawVtkEjgwSvwvvZloFNUAnORYnRj6QpC9CYS2e5ylc/pb0dOs4RWh2 /WHZ7wfrhIOY8CgIe/RmQeOLBvOlm55ZHXpDYpLGByREWDljS7uv7ddQJ+FIbYg3 BSjd43z7PKbmgo5grrYZAf33ncTR1wn2Nc/nyle6BPjzLazzsij3e3pKZgM1x8Ea fe+KtDWmGDd9FjYwW9cm6VvBLaz1Je3ReQVrdHBWPZn2v29mdZKiHPAzy2f/LZvc 1JPQ9oGHki/Z+YuYmJVVLW8uE1dhY4EZ38bwjP9MoX226dUQ/caU0YTE66FeO/z6 rPx5fVAJXW87xFqXBdX1T2wVsmAnG0YKBg6fB+YluGb0HQeWn0u+H8KqG6xqdPMQ eE8b1NWOh+6swaUeRf56yTvqUnI/aI+qUhMn+r9lrDtw3H8i7O1MzSHXIW0ID5EK JSULFI6EBLkJScv2JmCbsvlLD9IXY7EteK8femIcRclpPJHpqoo1llpFswddRLOe Rn/GxmQT5OBgxwG1zdxVpbWOwOO423b+9ciscg1OETsOUDZ7mQdR9H5vYLpsmW2V wJW9ZSn/9YbK03KN7ktaRoxgVi0X9qHnVohZuRG9qQd+JBY7kTS2KbosJAq59wDh yjCYA/CrrDNkZxL8YkKdy/o5o9ZUFgn5wW5rZ3d10Cdcfdd6zvs= =zSyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+ARLBH93C7pgvpZY--