From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
        pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Make typeof and typeof_unqual fallback definitions work on
 C++11
In-reply-to: 
 <CAAKRu_YBRnM0VuREmBL7coMBG4z016qhVS_usBH4FeVkAETc1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E1w1fGs-000Eon-0O@gemulon.postgresql.org>
 <CAAKRu_YBRnM0VuREmBL7coMBG4z016qhVS_usBH4FeVkAETc1g@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
	message dated "Sun, 15 Mar 2026 11:28:12 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <2018117.1773591338.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 12:15:38 -0400
Message-ID: <2018118.1773591338@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2018118.1773591338%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 2:48=E2=80=AFAM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentra=
ut.org> wrote:
>> Make typeof and typeof_unqual fallback definitions work on C++11

> Seems like this broke at least canebrake [1]

Doesn't appear to have satisfied any of the previously-broken animals
either.  It looks like the C compiler is okay but building bitcode
with clang is not okay.  We're really going to need separate
definitions for the two cases.

			regards, tom lane