Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibcED-0005Zk-29 for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 03:18:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibcEB-0008Ga-MD for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 03:18:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibcEB-0008GT-Ek for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 03:18:23 +0000 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibcE9-00042i-5d for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 03:18:23 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21B74D2; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 22:18:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Dec 2019 22:18:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=y8pQeo/7FOH79rE6hWEDkldP7zd +MNc9wzl78WF6Zpc=; b=UP06GCQHn7e3hPv0IahOg2KC/m9OY5QHPqpoHLDgz70 J08ZADV+CdjtQsk5+EpLaZIWjugqo0rUljvEqI6rjpsYP0Q66vncVFZwjIEL9j+c KcVoWivkTcwsskiNjzql2T24fCpnfppWfoM8lqIASIM+8ZfLBjpbGcCd+/cpZ24a cN7aGjs4Ev4VGn3HWlX7LvSDCgB8smB61gQYXnAfMO99cO3NVWma7yQnIlDt23Jt QQJgcYtGLJgOT4u7JNPrpHJlG7QLf8a3gGZNaibm8HO+ZGfDF7bePHZQl6q5NuUs kZYxiz4H3xiOy0btstfW/PbFB7REi/m40j87I5mm9dQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=y8pQeo /7FOH79rE6hWEDkldP7zd+MNc9wzl78WF6Zpc=; b=siFqJ5rqxAHHXXpqj2u12R v0J05SYVhv1vMjFK0phgn609kUYoJSi6NM9SVKPhU15T9MA1TzPdTcznYi+lvJPu 7EvYGYT8VvJsYNgq4nZ616nXiNP2eZpTEHgeFbo0KRk8wupICeergICQwpDEiWpW 0MpWIttjlEq8Ql+kWXkGCjFnfyZD3UXUHrs51TmZzzxNdg/LkVK96BGTGdkw43PV OFZ44JjeD1UCI7eju4BAL3oP/YS5O9qIAYiUaZ8HslIJL/e0k9QaSCJrz2Ajsluk rBL6aUgy8qA8AGo1Eg9SzcoLB2X65tcORI1hBZ70YlU57/muqGZa4GT/qIQmQy5Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudejgedgheekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne gfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddt vdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhuihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprg hquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucfkphepudduuddruddtvddrudektddrudekheenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesphgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 04F228005A; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 22:18:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 12:18:14 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Tom Lane Cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Add a regression test for allow_system_table_mods Message-ID: <20191202031814.GD1696@paquier.xyz> References: <13656.1575041267@sss.pgh.pa.us> <315cfd3b-9d04-0ea4-76d8-1507c8bd9bb7@2ndquadrant.com> <15399.1575043746@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9l24NVCWtSuIVIod" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15399.1575043746@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:09:06AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I agree that this is somewhat pointless in the case of an "unsafe" test. > But using a different name isn't going to invalidate the test case, > so there's not really a reason to not follow the convention. And > trying to have an exception for unsafe_tests seems like a lot more > trouble than it'd be worth. Yeah, I agree that it would be just more simple to make the unsafe test adopt the convention and be done with it. Could you fix it please? longfin and mantid (as well as anybody running the unsafe tests by themselves) are complaining for three days now. -- Michael --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl3kgnYACgkQnvQgOdby QH320Q/+IlUD9bdtpHgYB3CXRacgtHLn7j3eIM/hixjyamgjTiYN+Pru6XICmpeI q7OC33stU6bojPdo6KkpWdNrKdNVs7xswPzQQdF7sUTxps9dH4qYRcXu5rRiuKSi nGORCiex86+sMvdfzOhrT1btNXOEqdiofN4Gv0fnYW25ejeJoUAp2yqkY7nYUIku svhPd09uiWSMU1awePegARomcY6XFHx9pFGqTT7jBZDKCYkH12SPHsplOw6Pz/Cg sDxkhJKpharmwamgvY1t+sipWUD4hNS1IJ6EeF6I0cCKpRvrsRnT8P+5SezjT+V2 JWQTCHZ4puk0ODj9TyfDsRkwSIQ4s/A8zJnZHMiHb2hqHtJ2H+0mJMHflOMcIQXr uICnT78jqiETqsT6EaaqiWOD4gXjaYBCVWNO3FimM6FTI8bSrw+szX7oFk219ifN 8F4jD5DRBnDF8S1XLGJECqWhCQuFYoDiUyzk2ahkVnTdwl0GO+B9/A2U5ly/fEzU OBeDC4nIYOeHcBVl/tmeHst5kiHHMOoLEgyy3iECFcTZWgecQy86NqmMgIX0tKdE zhPumGkd1oCporC7UCOnUKjPDgu1KpnbYU/9zLJ4rCBMGxCLBdF6+xjLDGruaevW KnXxjmZwAvHvkISvbtablfNdIUucCtbew+w4itImHKY/a0CBRbE= =Gpux -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod--