Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iochC-0000XD-Vn for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:26:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iochB-0001jo-Gz for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:26:05 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iochB-0001hZ-61 for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:26:05 +0000 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ioch8-00032l-RX for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:26:04 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0FD5A2; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 19:26:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Jan 2020 19:26:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paquier.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=CAPDd/WzqsUyWJTFPit/zYVA4SC 6MDtJ0jM6RvXcVL8=; b=VbuNbVCaGp6zzMH4n0ALkmJXWQSA2uB1WH2MgAinNgs BUIpNMApAjdXp67RaZgn7biqXyG6LTxzcq84OiPcIUbUFF6NqKf514ApZywS/mJ4 MSyJr+GQlJHWLYGV+m9zhlxVKqassMBzKZEE3hKItAysU+viAQWKL+R6ZlT+vKwQ P+FdlGVPldbYsY49ZxtAHeIssyjyVQ++nFrFKIERJtb+ihcgDuTr/Z3HKLe0PUlF FWO5tstLVysvKX250KWHsS6H1Cvoqz57Sox2/sOOXHoDA0z4PrBaYEIKfZnM5zbY jCBQTqWSu5qdrp4WU+FA0u7gUU2EMU4Jg5Jgq5fwjcA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CAPDd/ WzqsUyWJTFPit/zYVA4SC6MDtJ0jM6RvXcVL8=; b=wqbNlJbFqJ4OOObBo9MiXT uQjttQ5rxFOcGXk0cFAWvZvFfAsj4DL8BhxsM1hF4OY6XT/W5ANjbNnBjHaxYYDb 3+bw01DnJuufv8EMDCREjYMGlcos8lHLaNAnN8Hf7dBRTS+xiOsxSAUuTxazRpHe 6RNKruI/PnZz9s4O8s3dbsS1msxpknzV0TPG/KHt2lOPYRv5WuZpKLSUp1j2CnTe wYmyhho4DuozDZTjbxyP6Fwt8psn3u2pdcgcezbK3Ub2YLZ8mPwPwz4lvGOh3Gi/ OjFZ92Dr6MJOQ7f8Y7jRs4cHQv2klOwnmDQAKOZYsr0BPe0GZV7zcYPM29Kg5Nlg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvdehuddgvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgfrhhlucfvnfffucdljedtmdenucfjughrpeffhf fvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcurfgrqhhu ihgvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehprghquhhivghrrdighiiiqeenucfkphepudduuddrud dtvddrudektddrudekheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhes phgrqhhuihgvrhdrgiihiienucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from paquier.xyz (ee0822lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [111.102.180.185]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E78B480059; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 19:25:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:25:57 +0900 From: Michael Paquier To: Tom Lane Cc: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 Message-ID: <20200107002557.GB2386@paquier.xyz> References: <20200106045858.GJ3598@paquier.xyz> <18698.1578287190@sss.pgh.pa.us> <31057.1578341305@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31057.1578341305@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I updated prairiedog and gaur to use OpenSSL 1.0.1e, but we are > not out of the woods there: >=20 > * prairiedog required 6:46 to run the ssl test [1], compared to 3:24 > in its last run with 0.9.8x. Why so much slower? I have seen the tests being slower depending on the version of OpenSSL pattern, though I think that it came with 1.1.0. I have no bothered digging into that though, but I can notice the difference. -- Michael --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl4T0BUACgkQnvQgOdby QH28kxAAqQO8SOn71UsnYiCuJScOdYafF/H3eQFl1HJKnpHMWFyyfHlNh+YA6g7/ jIv+oapqlaAIW6YcJjvxJyjK6ovHjVtT8avwbjpmtBsrfiQBycyDCItUjqtBPaX6 lRFtyRm60HGPbnqPyz355d9bLUGsYSHJKkFN+gOGHmcQwD26Jsufzv851J9YlUw6 AI7o26WRz6PvMnS5HycIF+aQGFwRbtLKUZcymSV+wuM4ZL2dRCoyJJf0D02/TQ0Y wkZ+kAh0khzrMLxrLFHUgZJp0oAjHcnP61I4cgQHJEcmzTOlZufj2/lv7UrQb8fj YgUosTKwggdA1hgDzHDxBAForCDy7T9Rpi2AkfH6rMtmIAegf3K+VDDNICX6EVWY If34yB4De83oJMkfhHMpiANn2Lxoj+Du0oCRyHgEGIiLtgtcrOkXT5VNPS/Av0S3 PVJeJSdUlqB5isPOmmj7kT+cmRQgJsnP28ZvTbLcDLyLygEZMjSdCf0KYxyPRduJ z5Gnp9XsutmguwndgmWQPszUsW4THaybaoUuisc6QZ0i0PZCn3V/DMjG1sgFXQ5h idBOSvJaZsrpiJnI8amRcNfaOkEFGdh/b3CFnzqaEgfOpf2IFDLT3OgYDAw8Zo8d C3B9HAq42PyqU+yFBP52rXxwyhPk2nu7zR/GGGbVpCUxltPXh3o= =aOvV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--