Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMvVe-0002z3-Gy for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:23:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMvVd-0005Sz-CE for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:23:57 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMvVd-0005Ss-6j for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:23:57 +0000 Received: from mail-qk1-x741.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::741]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMvVW-0002n2-AK for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:23:56 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-x741.google.com with SMTP id j4so2399506qkc.11 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:23:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2Can/ZLZmNRhqbv9+in2cCtq4cWQC/UH7I/szdfmdvI=; b=vcDfeEaJH6pAdCzWxBMSKQ8+2MMobt9bFz/lu4uh5CDGYQtlFUghKSXzQo60rvFP+Y 9qqXJJY8AR36Osp/fyx0LGHkRxNYJkhiL/xS9peMZXkjNibsQSuQej496NvW8LVu/aWy g7cxE6BoH8SZ2hmgBgkPSX76TEubO1/3Zre7Bqow04opMV3ka69i7r4qxymJaaPPZ4kw BNAmH//Dr7lDsyvkWKlwzEg/UbXv33FLhs/a+pj+UIco+GgQktXd1uQIsU/C34I/ZgeN xDsVMCkeDU8gjs6KZd0kgaTHwhxgfpGBQfM84fzm33V58eKqGIiBVyy3nJ5uGPTbfhw5 jM+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=2Can/ZLZmNRhqbv9+in2cCtq4cWQC/UH7I/szdfmdvI=; b=oMdc8SES8UQ8zdCTefMJGBhlrVe/F+t67c7oaDg7Q9+wIjdrHZXa7G0S8W5gNRIB5t 9xwkiA3qNF1BphdI/xtpCbhXqjC0pxOns4n8l692m+9LDcF6vZNu/XqyiElUdTTNCKxW bHC+xKdHR4JM94MHfXOb5D2kA30a+Bp+biW6Su7fjm7TM7xwoKbZXdQvloERC49csyD6 tU9rvn14BsL+g07KZsGO9j0oYNNjyvyJ+g0YV0h/hr944k8FRc44rli96denNVuipoEO +mqH3dJs95TrMEJu7y8igXEs+2/1Q2dBhS8yONgzjgMKE8HvkOQ+6L0MV1sIwNPA0wg8 rZGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ59lmGlYi/7MrjGQnR30mGM+HzySLGxBfrQ8KA7Uf+2XA7sTAX kNZtk01oA2N/4eCrCnM+4mv4gw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKZtlcNpgQOWvvVfcFVzCQBQN9JpxdxP7htuLoGimE3mzsTHfZ45dLDGg0Y3MtGGUZsBOTJMw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:c0d:: with SMTP id 13mr2178093qkm.25.1586532228448; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org ([190.95.18.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g187sm1724964qkf.115.2020.04.10.08.23.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nimloth.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 412C4300727; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:23:45 -0400 (-04) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:23:45 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Kyotaro Horiguchi Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove testing for precise LSN/reserved bytes in new TAP test Message-ID: <20200410152345.GA13282@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200410.113332.337305854143176317.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 2020-Apr-10, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > Yeah. We have at least four different buildfarm members complaining > > about this test case. I took this patch and further lobotomized the > > tests by removing *all* dependencies on restart_lsn and > > pg_current_wal_lsn(). If anybody wants to put any of that back, > > the burden of proof will be on them to show why we should believe > > the results will be stable, not for the buildfarm to demonstrate > > that they're not. > > I think the significant part of the test is wal_status. So I'm not > eager to get it back. Agreed. Thanks for stabilizing it. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services