Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:01:52 -0500
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
Message-ID: <20210423180152.GA17270@telsasoft.com>
References: 
 <CA+TgmoaVOx7K0BE8xpR=_FwLGEP1kJoSx+oskCsVGmuJq5h4vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210421230649.GA19244@alvherre.pgsql>
 <20210422174346.GE7256@telsasoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210422174346.GE7256@telsasoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210423180152.GA17270%40telsasoft.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:43:46PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Maybe the behavior should be documented, though.  Actually, I thought the
> pre-existing (non)behavior of autoanalyze would've been documented, and we'd
> now update that.  All I can find is this:
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-analyze.html
> |The autovacuum daemon, however, will only consider inserts or updates on the
> |parent table itself when deciding whether to trigger an automatic analyze for
> |that table
> 
> I think that should probably have been written down somewhere other than for
> the manual ANALYZE command, but in any case it seems to be outdated now.

Starting with this