Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eddbi-0005IQ-4W for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:01:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eddbh-00056N-In for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:01:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eddbh-00056D-Ai for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:01:57 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eddbe-0001N8-MP for pgsql-committers@postgresql.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:01:56 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0MF1odh021340; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:01:50 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Andres Freund , pgsql-committers Subject: Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins. In-reply-to: References: <20171221092940.gbxcszbzsr5khsfr@alap3.anarazel.de> <20171221095550.d3e7xhoakcowhu5b@alap3.anarazel.de> <20171222082203.fl6rpzlqnm4h7h6h@alap3.anarazel.de> <30219.1514428346@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4503.1514435195@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:47:17 +1300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <21338.1516633310.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:01:50 -0500 Message-ID: <21339.1516633310@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Thomas Munro > wrote: >> It looks to me like longfin's average and >> variation increased half way between fa330f9a and 18042840, somewhere >> near Dec 7 to 9, when we went from ~40s +/- 1 to ~50s with several >> seconds' variation. Was there some other environmental change then on >> that machine? > Ahh. That corresponds to the release of this patch: > https://support.apple.com/en-nz/HT208331 Yeah, I'm pretty sure that I installed that update immediately when it came out. There were some other strange things going on on that machine too; I remember having noticed and killed a daemon process that seemed to be stuck at 100% CPU. That might explain the sudden dropoff in runtimes in early January. And seeing that the times seem to be back up, I looked just now, and there it is again: PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #WQ #PORT MEM PURG CMPRS PGRP 360 fontworker 75.9 238 hrs 4 4 45- 28M 0B 0B 360 359 fontd 25.3 86:18:50 4/1 3/1 74 33M+ 0B 1396K 359 76 logd 12.7 26:25:16 5 5 611 31M- 0B 0B 76 46241 top 2.6 00:01.04 1/1 0 23 2140K 0B 0B 46241 Weird --- my other macOS machines aren't doing that. Anyway, it looks like we should write off these longfin timings as ambient noise :-( regards, tom lane