Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s7uNm-008EHE-NI for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 May 2024 10:00:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s7uNm-009fqW-Et for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 May 2024 10:00:10 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s7uNm-009fqO-7W for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 May 2024 10:00:10 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s7uNh-000goL-9d for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 May 2024 10:00:09 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-51f57713684so2436478e87.1 for ; Fri, 17 May 2024 03:00:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1715940003; x=1716544803; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1D/bvXHL3gTym9Xsy3XHVDA2jQZLR7YMxOmht83TvYs=; b=Lm7VXV7tgxklNZJXs54ecsb7369bAaI60ApXJji35teQ3lD+X+lPC2Zhdti2ohwYmb J0PFKn+dB5fSVHIqpgxTs+jpr/sjyEDdmxhCiYrhrbQUqKO5s8Pj08YV/3zf/qlsSgcf u01ygAckOFg48OVQlmHd808krmMFZoQRat+iGJxPIce6up0gDsyCO0H5TWtV5R8LOEtO JrBAAO7lI8ddnlWpt2qP0FJ/uSkuqHHAmHUqMB500UGblH7Qdfu3/uKArhjdv3ozo5Yp DJ+qJWKEgv7ElkUCgdmF/13jgbBMhl9uNUeGQJv4XgNHsKJ0OYRHdvWar5QLv6fK2y33 McBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715940003; x=1716544803; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1D/bvXHL3gTym9Xsy3XHVDA2jQZLR7YMxOmht83TvYs=; b=xRIHJKjntwh9RdjqPSG2v4bvmYnVOo4cVXcijyP+nkMSiY/pgEytu0tYBQnT7nVkt9 1GU2yU/EASEB0IovROC/zRqDtKO6KxXh1Y49h5j34PigHYIpbycKpFrMPR/FpCK8ZVnY HzZRztGp/3Yi1mFpgTGRpC7IyF3wcaTCmPC1YkXUcUij9SpW5yPjoVyAvU7qGwxa8bFo 8w40g+EFKOgkd91VfNP21mb9gmI158BNzhHe59A+lMAG9vGdbPjsVuMFRVIDOJC2Lwvp mk35UtpcxMen5QW9UazD5OUug8OtuxsL3JwXajtpvSFbCvuzGtPiyt33kH//pn4+lqLh s6DQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWoT79PtvwVSwsISijbxvABbjcZT83Fk7FxIn3AEdlRbs2L4pJIOEuYMPVMkCm8y3wgO5+N/W1s/OA633Gz6jGbURqwK8OCvsfz2Q8q+PTXQECCeHdH X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxMGCyU32l8Ia+fElYGWGuuj4oLd6gPyE0AW5W+mo4eHGakC0/+ E1h68RHSxnnKA85fpYS9K9VUqjj6tDUhZgqDXxtuR4X+BhOcfxW4NyoqNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFQnW/yinoeICyDheRt3nVryGWNYkyxM0Q6hWX1rlkUVTNU/Ienh2Mk9L9wRhx9kQ80uLbKtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1314:b0:51f:601f:cbae with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5220ff73602mr16134795e87.56.1715940002953; Fri, 17 May 2024 03:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [1.0.0.7] ([178.155.16.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-521f38d8b44sm3288989e87.209.2024.05.17.03.00.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 May 2024 03:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <21c7267f-c27b-af5a-2c61-8777098587cb@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 13:00:00 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: pgsql: Update obsolete index scan TID comments. To: Peter Geoghegan , pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Alexander Lakhin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hello Peter, 12.03.2024 01:07, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > Update obsolete index scan TID comments. > > Oversight in commit c2fe139c20. I found one more obsolete comment mentioning xs_ctup:             /*              * For IndexOnlyScan, the tuple stored in ss_ScanTupleSlot may be              * a virtual tuple that does not have the ctid column, so we have              * to get the TID from xs_ctup.t_self.              */             IndexScanDesc scan = ((IndexOnlyScanState *) scanstate)->ioss_ScanDesc;             *current_tid = scan->xs_heaptid; Maybe you would like to fix it too... Best regards, Alexander