Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u5Scs-000d3r-PC for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:02:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u5Scq-00CzoW-Ar for pgsql-committers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:02:09 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u5Scq-00CzoO-3r for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:02:08 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1u5Scn-000bV8-1Y for pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:02:08 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 53HH25Ya2249832 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:02:05 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgsql: Make SQLFunctionCache long-lived again. In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:57:47 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2249830.1744909325.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:02:05 -0400 Message-ID: <2249831.1744909325@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > Make SQLFunctionCache long-lived again. Drat ... immediately after pushing these patches, I realized I'd forgotten to adjust the commit messages to include a discussion link. For the archives' sake: Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1112592.1744572204@sss.pgh.pa.us regards, tom lane