Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5bNj-0006UX-Kw for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:42:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5bNi-0005YV-OW for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:42:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5bNi-0005YO-5d for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:42:18 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5bNg-0007xb-0G for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:42:17 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uACGgC0p022900; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:42:12 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Amit Kapila , Ashutosh Sharma , Robert Haas , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. In-reply-to: <20161112163508.5uqlaozeyr3l56ae@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <20160826220026.2fw6xj56qgd22wqi@alap3.anarazel.de> <20160830023140.tsesenk7roajx3ak@alap3.anarazel.de> <20161112130408.kfsxcbkqo2b3nvuq@alap3.anarazel.de> <22432.1478968242@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20161112163508.5uqlaozeyr3l56ae@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:35:08 -0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <22898.1478968932.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:42:12 -0500 Message-ID: <22899.1478968932@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andres Freund writes: > On 2016-11-12 11:30:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> which is a rather blatant waste of cycles. I would suggest an explicit >> do-nothing installcheck rule rather than the hack you came up with here. > I had that at first, but that generates a warning about overwriting the > makefile target - which afaics cannot be fixed. Hm. What about inventing an additional macro NO_INSTALLCHECK that prevents pgxs.mk from generating an installcheck rule? It's not like we don't have similar issues elsewhere, eg contrib/sepgsql. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers