Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vifW0-00CnzU-16 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 21:13:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vifVy-009XOW-0J for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 21:13:22 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vifVx-009XOO-2Z for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 21:13:22 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vifVv-001mpz-2N for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 21:13:21 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 60LLDE7Q2418463; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 16:13:14 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Jelte Fennema-Nio cc: Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: pgsql: tests: Add a test C++ extension module In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Jelte Fennema-Nio message dated "Wed, 21 Jan 2026 22:00:39 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2418461.1769029994.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 16:13:14 -0500 Message-ID: <2418462.1769029994@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Jelte Fennema-Nio writes: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 at 21:25, Robert Haas wrote: >> This patch caused my usual build process to fail. I have been setting >> CC='ccache clang' in my environment, and I was able to fix make it >> work again by also setting CXX='ccache clang'. Before that, I was >> getting my macPorts version of clang (21.1.2) for C source files but >> the OS version of clang (15.0.0) for c++ files. But I still don't >> really understand how that caused this failure, which doesn't look >> like it has anything to do with mixing compilers: > Seems like the same error as Peter Smith. BF member sevengill is showing the identical error, but my various macOS-based animals are OK. Maybe comparing their configuration choices would yield insight. regards, tom lane